The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Closing the Loop: Physician Communication With Diabetic Patients Who Have Low Health Literacy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients recall or comprehend as little as half of what physicians convey during an outpatient encounter. To enhance recall, comprehension, and adherence, it is recommended that physicians elicit patients' comprehension of new concepts and tailor subsequent information, particularly for patients with low functional health literacy. It is not known how frequently physicians apply this interactive educational strategy, or whether it is associated with improved health outcomes. METHODS: We used direct observation to measure the extent to which primary care physicians working in a public hospital assess patient recall and comprehension of new concepts during outpatient encounters, using audiotapes of visits between 38 physicians and 74 English-speaking patients with diabetes mellitus and low functional health literacy. We then examined whether there was an association between physicians' application of this interactive communication strategy and patients' glycemic control using information from clinical and administrative databases. RESULTS: Physicians assessed recall and comprehension of any new concept in 12 (20%) of 61 visits and for 15 (12%) of 124 new concepts. Patients whose physicians assessed recall or comprehension were more likely to have hemoglobin A(1c) levels below the mean (< or = 8.6%) vs patients whose physicians did not (odds ratio, 8.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-74.9) (P =.02). After multivariate logistic regression, the 2 variables independently associated with good glycemic control were higher health literacy levels (odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-14.47) (P =.04) and physicians' application of the interactive communication strategy (odds ratio, 15.15; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-110.78) (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians caring for patients with diabetes mellitus and low functional health literacy rarely assessed patient recall or comprehension of new concepts. Overlooking this step in communication reflects a missed opportunity that may have important clinical implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature
Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m · Cited by 2,430
Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease
Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., & Ware, J. E. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010 · Cited by 2,043
Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02640361 · Cited by 2,023
Association of Health Literacy With Diabetes Outcomes
Schillinger, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.4.475 · Cited by 1,938
Self-citationDevelopment of a brief test to measure functional health literacy
Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., Parker, R. M., Gazmararian, J. A., & Nurss, J. (1999) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00116-5 · Cited by 1,544
Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills
Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Root, J. H. (1996) · American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/00000446-199612000-00022 · Cited by 1,432
Teaching patients with low literacy skills
(2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e518822004-001 · Cited by 1,229
Inequality in Quality: Addressing Socioeconomic, Racial, and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care
Fiscella, K., Franks, P., Gold, M. R., & Clancy, C. M. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.19.2579 · Cited by 1,183
Williams, M. V., Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M., & Nurss, J. R. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.2.166 · Cited by 1,157
Cited by
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014
American Diabetes Association (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s014 · Cited by 4,572
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2013
American Diabetes Association (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-s011 · Cited by 4,369
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012
(2012) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-s011 · Cited by 2,240
Medication Adherence: WHO Cares?
Brown, M. T., & Bussell, J. K. (2011) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0575 · Cited by 1,928
Metadata
- Authors
- Schillinger, D., Piette, J., Grumbach, K., Wang, F., Wilson, C., Daher, C., Leong-Grotz, K., Castro, C., & Bindman, A. B.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-01-13
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011761219
- Cited by
- 1,162
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 63.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Closing the Loop: Physician Communication With Diabetic Patients Who Have Low Health Literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.163.1.83
- The paper
- Schillinger, D., Piette, J., Grumbach, K., Wang, F., Wilson, C., Daher, C., Leong-Grotz, K., Castro, C., & Bindman, A. B. (2003). Closing the Loop: Physician Communication With Diabetic Patients Who Have Low Health Literacy. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.1.83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.