The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pharmacists on Rounding Teams Reduce Preventable Adverse Drug Events in Hospital General Medicine Units
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that medication errors result from lack of sufficient information during the prescribing step. Therefore, it is proposed that having a pharmacist available when patients are evaluated during the rounding process may reduce the likelihood of preventable adverse drug events (ADEs). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of having a pharmacist participate with a physician rounding team on preventable ADEs in general medicine units and to document pharmacist interventions made during the rounding process. METHODS: A single-blind, standard care-controlled study design was used to compare patients receiving care from a rounding team including a pharmacist with patients receiving standard care (no pharmacist on rounding team). Patients admitted to and discharged from the same general medicine unit were included in the study. The main outcome measure of this study was preventable ADEs. Patient records were randomly selected and evaluated by a blinded process involving independent senior pharmacist specialists and a senior staff physician. Interventions made by the pharmacists in the treatment group were documented. RESULTS: The rate of preventable ADEs was reduced by 78%, from 26.5 per 1000 hospital days to 5.7 per 1000 hospital days. There were 150 documented interventions recommended during the rounding process, 147 of which were accepted by the team. The most common interventions were (1) dosing-related changes and (2) recommendations to add a drug to therapy. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist participation with the medical rounding team on a general medicine unit contributes to a significant reduction in preventable ADEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention
Bates, D. W. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530010043033 · Cited by 2,127
Cited by
Five Years After To Err Is Human: What Have We Learned?
Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2384 · Cited by 1,250
Kwan, J. L., Lo, L., Sampson, M., & Shojania, K. G. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00006 · Cited by 422
Poon, E. G., Cina, J. L., Churchill, W., Patel, N., Featherstone, E., Rothschild, J. M., Keohane, C. A., Whittemore, A. D., Bates, D. W., & Gandhi, T. K. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00006 · Cited by 294
Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings
Ciapponi, A., Fernandez Nievas, S. E., Seijo, M., Rodríguez, M. B., Vietto, V., García-Perdomo, H. A., Virgilio, S., Fajreldines, A. V., Tost, J., Rose, C. J., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009985.pub2 · Cited by 105
Cox, Z. L., Neal, E. B., Waitman, L. R., Peterson, N. B., Bhave, G., Siew, E. D., Danciu, I., Lewis, J. B., Peterson, J. F., & McCoy, A. B. (2012) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2012-03-ra-0009 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Kucukarslan, S. N., Peters, M., Mlynarek, M., & Nafziger, D. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-09-22
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2014
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987736462
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacists on Rounding Teams Reduce Preventable Adverse Drug Events in Hospital General Medicine Units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.163.17.2014
- The paper
- Kucukarslan, S. N., Peters, M., Mlynarek, M., & Nafziger, D. A. (2003). Pharmacists on Rounding Teams Reduce Preventable Adverse Drug Events in Hospital General Medicine Units. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.17.2014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.