Cited by 97Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Effectiveness of Amiodarone for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm: A Meta-analysis

Letelier, Luz M., Udol, Kamol, Ena, Javier, Weaver, Bruce, Guyatt, Gordon H.·2003·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although clinicians sometimes choose amiodarone to convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm, no current and comprehensive systematic review has summarized its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of amiodarone in converting AF to sinus rhythm over a 4-week period. METHODS: Two reviewers conducted a systematic search for randomized trials in databases, complemented by hand searches and contact with experts. Selected trials compared amiodarone with placebo, digoxin, or calcium channel blockers for conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Reviewers evaluated the methodology and extracted data from each primary study. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met eligibility criteria. Duration of AF proved to be a source of heterogeneity, leading to 2 analyses. The relative risk (RR) for achieving sinus rhythm was 4.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.76-6.77) for trials with mean AF duration of greater than 48 hours and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.25-1.57) for those with AF of 48 hours or less. The risk differences for these 2 groups were 27% and 26%, respectively, yielding a number needed to treat of 4 for both groups. The low control event rate among trials with long duration of AF, compared with that of trials with a duration of 48 hours or less, explained the difference in the RR for conversion. We found that the size of the left atrium, presence of cardiovascular disease, and protocols of amiodarone administration did not influence the magnitude of effect. Serious adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone is effective for converting AF to sinus rhythm in a wide range of patients. Although use of amiodarone is apparently safe, safety data are too scarce for definitive conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.163.7.777

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Letelier, L. M., Udol, K., Ena, J., Weaver, B., & Guyatt, G. H.
Corresponding author
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2003-04-14
Volume
163
Issue
7
Pages
777
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004953997
Cited by
97
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
amiodarone, atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm restoration, digoxin, calcium channel blockers, atrial fibrillation duration, adverse events, drug safety
MeSH terms
Amiodarone, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Risk, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review