Cited by 1,182Restless Legs Syndrome ResearchSleep and related disordersParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Restless Legs Syndrome Prevalence and Impact: REST General Population Study

Open access
Allen, Richard P., Walters, Arthur S., Montplaisir, Jacques, Hening, Wayne, Myers, Andrew, Bell, Timothy J., Ferini-Strambi, Luigi·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Restless legs syndrome (RLS), a common sensorimotor disorder, has a wide range of severity from merely annoying to affecting sleep and quality of life severely enough to warrant medical treatment. Previous epidemiological studies, however, have failed to determine the prevalence of those with clinically significant RLS symptoms and to examine the life effects and medical experiences of this group. Methods A total of 16 202 adults (aged >/=18 years) were interviewed using validated diagnostic questions to determine the presence, frequency, and severity of RLS symptoms; respondents reporting RLS symptoms were asked about medical diagnoses and the impact of the disorder and completed the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Criteria determined by RLS experts for medically significant RLS (frequency at least twice a week, distress at least moderate) defined "RLS sufferers" as a group most likely to warrant medical treatment. Results In all, 15 391 fully completed questionnaires were obtained; in the past year, RLS symptoms of any frequency were reported by 1114 (7.2%). Symptoms occurred at least weekly for 773 respondents (5.0%); they occurred at least 2 times per week and were reported as moderately or severely distressing by 416 (2.7%). Of those 416 (termed RLS sufferers), 337 (81.0%) reported discussing their symptoms with a primary care physician, and only 21 (6.2%) were given a diagnosis of RLS. The SF-36 scores for RLS sufferers were significantly below populatio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.11.1286

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, R. P., Walters, A. S., Montplaisir, J., Hening, W., Myers, A., Bell, T. J., & Ferini-Strambi, L.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Seton Hall University (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-06-13
Volume
165
Issue
11
Pages
1286
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072667894
Cited by
1,182
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 61
FWCI
41.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • JFK Medical Center Foundation
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Université de Montréal
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
restless legs syndrome, prevalence, underdiagnosis, quality of life, sleep disorders, symptom severity, chronic disease, SF-36
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Restless Legs Syndrome, United States, Prevalence, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review