The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
American Pain Society Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Acute and Cancer Pain Management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American Pain Society (APS) set out to revise and expand its 1995 Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain and to facilitate improvements in the quality of pain management in all care settings. METHODS: Eleven multidisciplinary members of the APS with expertise in quality improvement or measurement participated in the update. Five experts from organizations that focus on health care quality reviewed the final recommendations. MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched (1994-2004) to identify articles on pain quality measurement and quality improvement published after the development of the 1995 guidelines. The APS task force revised and expanded recommendations on the basis of the systematic review of published studies. The more than 3000 members of the APS were invited to provide input, and the 5 experts provided additional comments. The task force synthesized reviewers' comments into the final set of recommendations. RESULTS: The recommendations specify that all care settings formulate structured, multilevel systems approaches (sensitive to the type of pain, population served, and setting of care) that ensure prompt recognition and treatment of pain, involvement of patients and families in the pain management plan, improved treatment patterns, regular reassessment and adjustment of the pain management plan as needed, and measurement of processes and outcomes of pain management. CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve the quality of pain management must move beyond assessment and communication of pain to implementation and evaluation of improvements in pain treatment that are timely, safe, evidence based, and multimodal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,736
Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
Cs, C., & Km, R. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 5,178
Neuronal plasticity: Increasing the gain in pain
Woolf, C. J., & Salter, M. W. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1765 · Cited by 3,781
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
Self-citationDisseminating Innovations in Health Care
Berwick, D. M. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.15.1969 · Cited by 1,878
Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce
Stewart, W. F. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.18.2443 · Cited by 1,570
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,494
Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: The M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory
Cleeland, C. S., Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Chou, C., Harle, M. T., Morrissey, M., & Engstrom, M. C. (2000) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1634::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-v · Cited by 1,360
Zech, D. F. J., Grond, S., Lynch, J., Hertel, D., & Lehmann, K. A. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00017-m · Cited by 1,015
Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain
Max, M. B. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530230060032 · Cited by 795
Cited by
Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Riba, M. B., Donovan, K. A., Andersen, B., Braun, I., Breitbart, W. S., Brewer, B. W., Buchmann, L. O., Clark, M. M., Collins, M., Corbett, C., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048 · Cited by 871
Meta-Analysis of Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Pain in Patients With Cancer
Sheinfeld Gorin, S., Krebs, P., Badr, H., Janke, E. A., Jim, H. S. L., Spring, B., Mohr, D. C., Berendsen, M. A., & Jacobsen, P. B. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.37.0437 · Cited by 292
Psychological treatment of chronic pain
Kerns, R. D., Sellinger, J., & Goodin, B. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090310-120430 · Cited by 267
Devin, C. J., & McGirt, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.003 · Cited by 260
Ecological momentary assessment methodology in chronic pain research: a systematic review
May, M., Junghaenel, D. U., Ono, M., Stone, A. A., & Schneider, S. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.006 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon, D. B., Dahl, J. L., Miaskowski, C., McCarberg, B., Todd, K. H., Paice, J. A., Lipman, A. G., Bookbinder, M., Sanders, S. H., Turk, D. C., & Carr, D. B.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-07-25
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1574
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157662040
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 35.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Pain Society Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Acute and Cancer Pain Management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.165.14.1574
- The paper
- Gordon, D. B., Dahl, J. L., Miaskowski, C., McCarberg, B., Todd, K. H., Paice, J. A., Lipman, A. G., Bookbinder, M., Sanders, S. H., Turk, D. C., & Carr, D. B. (2005). American Pain Society Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Acute and Cancer Pain Management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.14.1574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.