The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,845
Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
Cs, C., & Km, R. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 5,178
The short-form McGill pain questionnaire
Melzack, R. (1987) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8 · Cited by 4,368
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Pain · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29805-2_3023 · Cited by 3,954
A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R. (1983) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 · Cited by 3,395 · cited 1×
“The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire is a health status measure designed to be completed by patients to assess physical disability due to low back pain [68].”
BackgroundThe Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.
Vernon, H. T., & Mior, S. A. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 3,048
Apfelbaum, J. L., Chen, C., Mehta, S. S., & Gan, A. T. J. (2003) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000068822.10113.9e · Cited by 2,203
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Fairbank, J. C. T., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O'Brien, J. P. (2020) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t04205-000 · Cited by 2,033
Gerbershagen, H. J., Aduckathil, S., van Wijck, A. J. M., Peelen, L. M., Kalkman, C. J., & Meissner, W. (2013) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31828866b3 · Cited by 1,574
From the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Loeb, J. M. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.275.7.508 · Cited by 1,534
Cited by
Dort, J. C., Farwell, D. G., Findlay, M., Huber, G. F., Kerr, P., Shea-Budgell, M. A., Simon, C., Uppington, J., Zygun, D., Ljungqvist, O., et al. (2017) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2981 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Devin, C. J., & McGirt, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 930-938
- ISSN
- 0967-5868 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985324768
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 18.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.003
- The paper
- Devin, C. J., & McGirt, M. J. (2015). Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
