Cited by 76Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcareCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Regional and Institutional Variation in the Initiation of Early Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders

Zingmond, David S., Wenger, Neil S.·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are an important step in decision making about aggressiveness of care for patients in hospitals. The use of DNR orders is known to vary with patient characteristics, but few studies have investigated the role of hospital factors or of regional variation. We examined these influences on the use of early DNR orders (written <24 hours after admission). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients 50 years and older admitted to acute-care hospitals in California in 2000 from the most prevalent medical and surgical diagnosis related groups. We performed multivariate logistic regression predicting use of DNR by hospital characteristics while accounting for patient characteristics, and estimated indirectly standardized rates of DNR use by county. RESULTS: In the selected diagnosis related groups, 819 686 persons were admitted to 386 hospitals. Early DNR orders varied from 2% (patients aged 50-59 years) to 17% (patients aged > or =80 years). In multivariate analyses, the odds of having early DNR orders written were significantly lower in for-profit (vs private nonprofit) hospitals, higher in the smallest (vs the largest) hospitals, and lower in academic (vs nonacademic) hospitals. Standardized rates of DNR order use varied 10-fold across counties. The highest rates were among patients from rural areas. However, variation in use did not correspond well to county population, hospital bed availability, or population density. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital characteristics appear to be associated with the use of DNR orders, even after accounting for differences in patient characteristics. This association reflects institutional culture, technological bent, and physician practice patterns. If these factors do not match patient preferences, then improvements in care are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.15.1705

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zingmond, D. S., & Wenger, N. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-08-08
Volume
165
Issue
15
Pages
1705
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096545435
Cited by
76
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Keywords
do-not-resuscitate orders, regional variation, hospital characteristics, institutional variation, for-profit hospitals, academic medical centers, rural hospitals, older adults, end-of-life decisions, aggressive care, institutional culture
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Hospitals, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Logistic Models, Resuscitation Orders, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review