The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Models and Patient Predictors of Readmission for Heart Failure<subtitle>A Systematic Review</subtitle>
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Readmission after heart failure (HF) hospitalization is an increasing focus for physicians and policy makers, but statistical models are needed to assess patient risk and to compare hospital performance. We performed a systematic review to describe models designed to compare hospital rates of readmission or to predict patients' risk of readmission, as well as to identify studies evaluating patient characteristics associated with hospital readmission, all among patients admitted for HF. METHODS: We identified relevant studies published between January 1, 1950, and November 19, 2007, by searching MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and all 4 Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Eligible English-language publications reported on readmission after HF hospitalization among adult patients. We excluded experimental studies and publications without original data or quantitative outcomes. RESULTS: From 941 potentially relevant articles, 117 met inclusion criteria: none contained models to compare readmission rates among hospitals, 5 (4.3%) presented models to predict patients' risk of readmission, and 112 (95.7%) examined patient characteristics associated with readmission. Studies varied in case identification, used multiple types of data sources, found few patient characteristics consistently associated with readmission, and examined differing outcomes, often either readmission alone or a combined outcome of readmission or death, measured across varying periods (from 14 days to 4 years). Two articles reported model discriminations of patient readmission risk, both of which were modest (C statistic, 0.60 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review identified no model designed to compare hospital rates of readmission, while models designed to predict patients' readmission risk used heterogeneous approaches and found substantial inconsistencies regarding which patient characteristics were predictive. Clinically, patient risk stratification is challenging. From a policy perspective, a validated risk-standardized statistical model to accurately profile hospitals using readmission rates is unavailable in the published English-language literature to date.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jiang, W., Alexander, J., Christopher, E., Kuchibhatla, M., Gaulden, L. H., Cuffe, M. S., Blazing, M. A., Davenport, C., Califf, R. M., Krishnan, R. R., et al. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.15.1849 · Cited by 934
Opasich, C., De Feo, S., Ambrosio, G. A., Bellis, P., Di Lenarda, A., Di Tano, G., Fico, D., Gonzini, L., Lavecchia, R., Tomasi, C., et al. (2004) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2003.11.021 · Cited by 44
Cited by
Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program
Jencks, S. F., Williams, M. V., & Coleman, E. A. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0803563 · Cited by 5,164
Krumholz, H. M., Merrill, A. R., Schone, E. M., Schreiner, G. C., Chen, J., Bradley, E. H., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, Z., Straube, B. M., et al. (2009) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.109.883256 · Cited by 580
Analysis of machine learning techniques for heart failure readmissions
Mortazavi, B. J., Downing, N. S., Bucholz, E. M., Dharmarajan, K., Manhapra, A., Li, S.-X., Negahban, S. N., & Krumholz, H. M. (2016) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.116.003039 · Cited by 401
D'Ascenzo, F., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Reed, M. J., Gabayan, G. Z., Suzuki, M., Costantino, G., Furlan, R., Del Rosso, A., Sarasin, F. P., Sun, B. C., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.083 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, J. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-07-14
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1371
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969966515
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Models and Patient Predictors of Readmission for Heart Failure<subtitle>A Systematic Review</subtitle>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1371
- The paper
- Ross, J. S. (2008). Statistical Models and Patient Predictors of Readmission for Heart Failure<subtitle>A Systematic Review</subtitle>. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.