Cited by 156Innovations in Medical EducationVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementHealth Sciences Research and Education

Changing clinical practice. Prospective study of the impact of continuing medical education and quality assurance programs on use of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism

Anderson, Frederick A.·1994·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of continuing medical education (CME) with and without a quality assurance component (CME+QA) on physician practices in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: A communitywide study was performed in 15 short-stay hospitals in central Massachusetts. The study population included 3158 patients in acute-care hospitals with multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Study hospitals were randomly assigned to one of two educational strategies or to a control group that received no intervention. RESULTS: The proportion of patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism who received effective methods of prophylaxis increased significantly from 29% in 1986 to 52% in 1989 (P < .001). This increase was seen in all study groups: control hospitals, 40% to 51% (P < .001); CME hospitals, 21% to 49% (P < .0001); and CME+QA hospitals, 27% to 55% (P < .0001). The increase in prophylaxis use from 1986 to 1989 was significantly greater among patients cared for in hospitals whose physicians participated in a formal CME program (an increase of 28%) than in control hospitals (an increase of 11%) (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the use of prophylaxis in hospitals whose physicians received CME+QA interventions compared with hospitals whose physicians received CME interventions alone (identical increases of 28%). CONCLUSION: A formal CME program significantly increased the frequency with which physicians prescribed prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. We believe the key factor in our CME interventions that motivated clinicians to change their practices was the provision of hospital-specific data demonstrating a compelling need for improvement. Despite the substantial investment by hospitals in QA, traditional QA intervention appeared to provide no additional benefit. Even after extensive CME/QA interventions, prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism remained underutilized, suggesting the need to develop new approaches to changing clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420060103011

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anderson 1994 found little or no difference in prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism when comparing feedback given to large groups as part of a CME program with and without sending individualised feedback reports to participants (adjusted RD = 0%; no P value reported).

    “Finally, Anderson 1994 found little or no difference when they compared feedback given to large groups as part of a CME (continuing medical education) program, with and without sending individualised feedback reports to participants for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (adjusted RD = 0%; no P value reported for this comparison).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, F. A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Frederick A.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
1994-03-28
Volume
154
Issue
6
Pages
669
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034483395
Cited by
156
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5r01hl035862-04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
continuing medical education, quality assurance, venous thromboembolism, thromboprophylaxis, physician practice change, hospital-acquired thrombosis, short-stay hospitals
MeSH terms
Aged, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Medical Staff, Hospital, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prospective Studies, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Thromboembolism, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review