The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pneumothorax Following Thoracentesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the factors related to the development of pneumothorax following thoracentesis. We aimed to determine the mean pneumothorax rate following thoracentesis and to identify risk factors for pneumothorax through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We reviewed MEDLINE-indexed studies from January 1, 1966, through April 1, 2009, and included studies of any design with at least 10 patients that reported the pneumothorax rate following thoracentesis. Two investigators independently extracted data on the pneumothorax rate, risk factors for pneumothorax, and study methodological quality. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies reported pneumothorax rates following 6605 thoracenteses. The overall pneumothorax rate was 6.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6%-7.8%), and 34.1% of pneumothoraces required chest tube insertion. Ultrasonography use was associated with significantly lower risk of pneumothorax (odds ratio [OR], 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7). Lower pneumothorax rates were observed with experienced operators (3.9% vs 8.5%, P = .04), but this was nonsignificant within studies directly comparing this factor (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.2-2.3). Pneumothorax was more likely following therapeutic thoracentesis (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8-3.8), in conjunction with periprocedural symptoms (OR, 26.6; 95% CI, 2.7-262.5), and in association with, although nonsignificantly, mechanical ventilation (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 0.95-16.8). Two or more needle passes conferred a nonsignificant increased risk of pneumothorax (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 0.3-20.1). CONCLUSIONS: Iatrogenic pneumothorax is a common complication of thoracentesis and frequently requires chest tube insertion. Real-time ultrasonography use is a modifiable factor that reduces the pneumothorax rate. Performance of thoracentesis for therapeutic purposes and in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation confers a higher likelihood of pneumothorax. Experienced operators may have lower pneumothorax rates. Patient safety may be improved by changes in clinical practice in accord with these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
Wall, A. (2000) · British Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.9.19311 · Cited by 5,903
Leape, L. L., Brennan, T. A., Laird, N., Lawthers, A. G., Localio, A. R., Barnes, B. A., Hebert, L., Newhouse, J. P., Weiler, P. C., & Hiatt, H. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199102073240605 · Cited by 3,711
Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis
Hind, D., Calvert, N., McWilliams, R., Davidson, A., Paisley, S., Beverley, C., & Thomas, S. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361 · Cited by 1,090
Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: A meta-analysis of the literature
Randolph, A. G., Cook, D. J., Gonzales, C. A., & Pribble, C. G. (1996) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020 · Cited by 852
Complications and Failures of Subclavian-Vein Catheterization
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199506083322313 · Cited by 626
Central Vein Catheterization: Failure and Complication Rates by Three Percutaneous Approaches
Sznajder, J. I. (1986) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1986.00360140065007 · Cited by 496
Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., & Lau, J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.006 · Cited by 492
Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1994.
Pokras, R., Kozak, L. J., & McCarthy, E. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 436
Cited by
Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions. An Official ATS/STS/STR Clinical Practice Guideline
Feller-Kopman, D. J., Reddy, C. B., DeCamp, M. M., Diekemper, R. L., Gould, M. K., Henry, T., Iyer, N. P., Lee, Y. C. G., Lewis, S. Z., Maskell, N. A., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201807-1415st · Cited by 470
Taylor, A. G., Mielke, C., & Mongan, J. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002697 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon, C. E.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-02-22
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 332
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968229264
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 14.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pneumothorax Following Thoracentesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.548
- The paper
- Gordon, C. E. (2010). Pneumothorax Following Thoracentesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.548
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.