The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced Depression Care for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Persistent Depressive Symptoms: Coronary Psychosocial Evaluation Studies Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are an established predictor of mortality and major adverse cardiac events (defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction or hospitalization for unstable angina or urgent/emergency revascularizations) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study was conducted to determine the acceptability and efficacy of enhanced depression treatment in patients with ACS. METHODS: A 3-month observation period to identify patients with ACS and persistent depressive symptoms was followed by a 6-month randomized controlled trial. From January 1, 2005, through February 29, 2008, 237 patients with ACS from 5 hospitals were enrolled, including 157 persistently depressed patients randomized to intervention (initial patient preference for problem-solving therapy and/or pharmacotherapy, then a stepped-care approach; 80 patients) or usual care (77 patients) and 80 nondepressed patients who underwent observational evaluation. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with depression care. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptom changes (assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory), major adverse cardiac events, and death. RESULTS: At the end of the trial, the proportion of patients who were satisfied with their depression care was higher in the intervention group (54% of 80) than in the usual care group (19% of 77) (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-12.9 [P < .001]). The Beck Depression Inventory score decreased significantly more (t(155) = 2.85 [P = .005]) for intervention patients (change, -5.7; 95% CI, -7.6 to -3.8; df = 155) than for usual care patients (change, -1.9; 95% CI, -3.8 to -0.1; df = 155); the depression effect size was 0.59 of the standard deviation. At the end of the trial, 3 intervention patients and 10 usual care patients had experienced major adverse cardiac events (4% and 13%, respectively; log-rank test, chi(2)(1) = 3.93 [P = .047]), as well as 5 nondepressed patients (6%) (for the intervention vs nondepressed cohort, chi(2)(1) = 0.48 [P = .49]). CONCLUSION: Enhanced depression care for patients with ACS was associated with greater satisfaction, a greater reduction in depressive symptoms, and a promising improvement in prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00158054.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“COPES (Coronary Psychosocial Evaluation Study) delivered 6 months of depression stepped care to 157 patients with ACS with persistent depressive symptoms; the intervention led to significant improvements in depression and to lower rates of major adverse cardiac events (4% versus 13%; P =0.047; no RR or CI reported) compared with usual care. 190”
From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [190]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Coronary patients with clinically significant depression can be safely and effectively treated with psychotherapy 84,85,351 -353 or selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, 354 -356 although evidence for a beneficial effect on cardiac endpoints is inconclusive.”
From European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) (2012) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Whereas most studies could show no significant beneficial effect, 84,351 -356 a recent RCT revealed fewer depressive symptoms as well as fewer major adverse cardiac events.85”
From European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) (2012) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“This approach can reduce mood symptoms and enhance health-related quality of life, although evidence for a definite beneficial effect on cardiac endpoints is inconclusive.”
From European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) (2012) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Molecular Mechanisms of Depression: Perspectives on New Treatment Strategies
Lang, U. E., & Borgwardt, S. (2013) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000350094 · Cited by 8,526
Selective Cortical Undercutting As a Means of Modifying and Studying Frontal Lobe Function in Man
Scoville, W. B. (1949) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1949.6.1.0065 · Cited by 7,374
Murray, C. J. L., & López, A. D. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07492-2 · Cited by 7,007
The PHQ-9: A New Depression Diagnostic and Severity Measure
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002) · Psychiatric Annals · doi:10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06 · Cited by 5,898
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
Kirsch, I., Deacon, B. J., Huedo-Medina, T. B., Scoboria, A., Moore, T. J., & Johnson, B. T. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045 · Cited by 2,442
Rosengren, A., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Sliwa, K., Zubaid, M., Almahmeed, W. A., Blackett, K. N., Sitthi-amorn, C., Sato, H., & Yusuf, S. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17019-0 · Cited by 2,414
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, Jr., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., Hoffing, M., Della Penna, R. D., Noël, P. H., Lin, E. H. B., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.22.2836 · Cited by 2,405
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [52]Frasure-Smith N Lespérance F Heterogeneity of patients with coronary artery disease and distress and the need to identify relevant subtypes [author reply] Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008 65 7 852 853 18606957
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012)
Authors/Task Force Members:, Perk, J., De Backer, G., Gohlke, H., Graham, I., Reiner, Ž., Verschuren, M., Albus, C., Benlian, P., Boysen, G., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092 · Cited by 8,490
European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary
Graham, I., Atar, D., Borch‐Johnsen, K., Boysen, G., Burell, G. K., Cífková, R., Dallongeville, J., Backer, G. D., Ebrahim, S. B. J., Gjelsvik, B., et al. (2007) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm316 · Cited by 3,865
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Authors/Task Force Members, Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M. T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487316653709 · Cited by 1,435
State of the art review: depression, stress, anxiety, and cardiovascular disease
Cohen, B. E., Edmondson, D., & Kronish, I. M. (2015) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpv047 · Cited by 955
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidson, K. W., Rieckmann, N., Clemow, L., Schwartz, J. E., Shimbo, D., Medina, V., Albanese, G., Kronish, I., Hegel, M., & Burg, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-04-12
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 600-8
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2882253
- OpenAlex
- W2073419058
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 25.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (n01hc25197-0-0-0, RR024156, HL-76857)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 84034, HC25197, R24HL076857, K24HL084034, HL76857, N01 HC025197, R01HL079235)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024156)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- acute coronary syndrome, persistent depressive symptoms, depression treatment, problem-solving therapy, antidepressant treatment, patient satisfaction, major adverse cardiac events, mortality, depression and cardiovascular risk, Beck Depression Inventory, usual care comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Patient Selection, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Coronary Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
