Cited by 350Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Depression Care for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Persistent Depressive Symptoms: Coronary Psychosocial Evaluation Studies Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are an established predictor of mortality and major adverse cardiac events (defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction or hospitalization for unstable angina or urgent/emergency revascularizations) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study was conducted to determine the acceptability and efficacy of enhanced depression treatment in patients with ACS. METHODS: A 3-month observation period to identify patients with ACS and persistent depressive symptoms was followed by a 6-month randomized controlled trial. From January 1, 2005, through February 29, 2008, 237 patients with ACS from 5 hospitals were enrolled, including 157 persistently depressed patients randomized to intervention (initial patient preference for problem-solving therapy and/or pharmacotherapy, then a stepped-care approach; 80 patients) or usual care (77 patients) and 80 nondepressed patients who underwent observational evaluation. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with depression care. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptom changes (assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory), major adverse cardiac events, and death. RESULTS: At the end of the trial, the proportion of patients who were satisfied with their depression care was higher in the intervention group (54% of 80) than in the usual care group (19% of 77) (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-12.9 [P < .001]). The Beck Depression Inventory score decreased significantly more (t(155) = 2.85 [P = .005]) for intervention patients (change, -5.7; 95% CI, -7.6 to -3.8; df = 155) than for usual care patients (change, -1.9; 95% CI, -3.8 to -0.1; df = 155); the depression effect size was 0.59 of the standard deviation. At the end of the trial, 3 intervention patients and 10 usual care patients had experienced major adverse cardiac events (4% and 13%, respectively; log-rank test, chi(2)(1) = 3.93 [P = .047]), as well as 5 nondepressed patients (6%) (for the intervention vs nondepressed cohort, chi(2)(1) = 0.48 [P = .49]). CONCLUSION: Enhanced depression care for patients with ACS was associated with greater satisfaction, a greater reduction in depressive symptoms, and a promising improvement in prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00158054.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.29

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [52]Frasure-Smith N Lespérance F Heterogeneity of patients with coronary artery disease and distress and the need to identify relevant subtypes [author reply] Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008 65 7 852 853 18606957

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davidson, K. W., Rieckmann, N., Clemow, L., Schwartz, J. E., Shimbo, D., Medina, V., Albanese, G., Kronish, I., Hegel, M., & Burg, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2010-04-12
Volume
170
Issue
7
Pages
600-8
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073419058
Cited by
350
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 34
FWCI
25.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25197-0-0-0, RR024156, HL-76857)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 84034, HC25197, R24HL076857, K24HL084034, HL76857, N01 HC025197, R01HL079235)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
acute coronary syndrome, persistent depressive symptoms, depression treatment, problem-solving therapy, antidepressant treatment, patient satisfaction, major adverse cardiac events, mortality, depression and cardiovascular risk, Beck Depression Inventory, usual care comparison
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Patient Selection, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review