The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary Care Clinicians' Experiences With Treatment Decision Making for Older Persons With Multiple Conditions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Clinicians are caring for an increasing number of older patients with multiple diseases in the face of uncertainty concerning the benefits and harms associated with guideline-directed interventions. Understanding how primary care clinicians approach treatment decision making for these patients is critical to the design of interventions to improve the decision-making process. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with 40 primary care clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) in academic, community, and Veterans Affairs-affiliated primary care practices. Participants were given open-ended questions about their approach to treatment decision making for older persons with multiple medical conditions. Responses were organized into themes using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The participants were concerned about their patients' ability to adhere to complex regimens derived from guideline-directed care. There was variability in beliefs regarding, and approaches to balancing, the benefits and harms of guideline-directed care. There was also variability regarding how the participants involved patients in the process of decision making, with clinicians describing conflicts between their own and their patients' goals. The participants listed a number of barriers to making good treatment decisions, including the lack of outcome data, the role of specialists, patient and family expectations, and insufficient time and reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of practicing clinicians suggest that they struggle with the uncertainties of applying disease-specific guidelines to their older patients with multiple conditions. To improve decision making, they need more data, alternative guidelines, approaches to reconciling their own and their patients' priorities, the support of their subspecialist colleagues, and an altered reimbursement system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Fried et al. showed that clinicians struggle with the uncertainties of applying disease-specific guidelines to their patients with multiple conditions, and would therefore benefit from a number of tools to assist them in decision making for this population [12].”
From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, C. M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L. P., Boult, L., & Wu, A. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.6.716 · Cited by 2,581 · cited 1×
“Second, the presence of these conditions may also increase the likelihood that the individual will experience adverse effects with any given intervention.(3,4) Finally, the polypharmacy that generally accompanies multimorbidity confers an increased risk of adverse drug events, independent of the chronic conditions.”
BackgroundUnderstanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients.
Fried, T., Bradley, E. H., Towle, V., & Allore, H. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa012528 · Cited by 1,426
Self-citationEffectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients
Coulter, A., & Ellins, J. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80 · Cited by 1,128
Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions.
Tinetti, M., Bogardus, S., & Agostini, J. V. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb042458 · Cited by 969 · cited 1×
“Second, the presence of these conditions may also increase the likelihood that the individual will experience adverse effects with any given intervention.(3,4) Finally, the polypharmacy that generally accompanies multimorbidity confers an increased risk of adverse drug events, independent of the chronic conditions.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPolypharmacy and Prescribing Quality in Older People
Steinman, M. A., Landefeld, C., Rosenthal, G. E., Berthenthal, D., Sen, Ś., & Kaboli, P. (2006) · Journal of The American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00889.x · Cited by 580
Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation who are prone to fall
Gage, B. F., Birman-Deych, E., Kerzner, R., Radford, M. J., Nilasena, D. S., & Rich, M. W. (2005) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.02.022 · Cited by 322 · cited 1×
“In addition to the studies demonstrating the risk of adverse outcomes associated with guideline-directed care, evidence also suggests that the patients who are at the highest risk for these adverse outcomes may also be the ones most likely to derive benefit from the intervention.(17) Clinicians’ descriptions of how th…”
BackgroundRisk Factors for Adverse Drug Events Among Older Adults in the Ambulatory Setting
Field, T., Gurwitz, J., Harrold, L., Rothschild, J., Debellis, K., Seger, A., Auger, J. C., Garber, L., Cadoret, C. A., Fish, L., et al. (2004) · Journal of The American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52367.x · Cited by 315 · cited 1×
“Finally, the polypharmacy that generally accompanies multimorbidity confers an increased risk of adverse drug events, independent of the chronic conditions.(5,6) On the other hand, editorials and clinical studies remind readers that the clinical trials”
BackgroundViews of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making
Belcher, V. N., Fried, T., Agostini, J. V., & Tinetti, M. (2006) · Journal of general internal medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00329.x · Cited by 279 · cited 1×
“Moreover, other clinicians noted that the reduction in risk for a disease-specific outcome might not be what was most important to the patient, an observation supported by studies indicating that the adverse effects of medications may be as, if not more, important to patients than their primary effects.(20,21) Disagre…”
ResultSelf-citationViews of Older Persons with Multiple Morbidities on Competing Outcomes and Clinical Decision‐Making
Fried, T. R., McGraw, S., Agostini, J. V., & Tinetti, M. E. (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01923.x · Cited by 203 · cited 1×
“Moreover, other clinicians noted that the reduction in risk for a disease-specific outcome might not be what was most important to the patient, an observation supported by studies indicating that the adverse effects of medications may be as, if not more, important to patients than their primary effects.(20,21) Disagre…”
ResultSelf-citationPitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality Measures
Walter, L. C., Davidowitz, N. P., Heineken, P. A., & Covinsky, K. E. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.20.2466 · Cited by 197
Gurwitz, J. H. (2004) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.164.18.1957 · Cited by 190
Greenfield, S., Billimek, J., Pellegrini, F., Franciosi, M., Berardis, G. D., Nicolucci, A., & Kaplan, S. H. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00005 · Cited by 172 · cited 1×
“First, the presence of comorbid conditions may result in persons receiving less benefit from therapy directed at a particular condition.(1,2) Second, the presence of these conditions may also increase the likelihood that the individual will experience adverse effects with any given intervention.”
BackgroundThe Relationship Between Number of Medications and Weight Loss or Impaired Balance in Older Adults
Agostini, J. V., Han, L., & Tinetti, M. E. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52467.x · Cited by 167 · cited 2×
“Finally, the polypharmacy that generally accompanies multimorbidity confers an increased risk of adverse drug events, independent of the chronic conditions.(5,6) On the other hand, editorials and clinical studies remind readers that the clinical trials”
BackgroundSelf-citationHuang, E. S., Zhang, Q., Gandra, N., Chin, M. H., & Meltzer, D. O. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00005 · Cited by 165 · cited 1×
“First, the presence of comorbid conditions may result in persons receiving less benefit from therapy directed at a particular condition.(1,2) Second, the presence of these conditions may also increase the likelihood that the individual will experience adverse effects with any given intervention.”
BackgroundNumeracy and Communication with Patients: They Are Counting on Us
Apter, A. J., Paasche‐Orlow, M. K., Remillard, J. T., Bennett, I. M., Ben-Joseph, E. P., Batista, R. M., HYDE, J. N., & Rudd, R. E. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0803-x · Cited by 163
Benefits and Risks of Drug Treatments
Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Psaty, B. M. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2008.723 · Cited by 136 · cited 1×
“These observations corroborate previous reports of the limitations of currently conducted randomized clinical trials to detect the full range of adverse effects of treatments in older adults with multimorbidity.(12) There is growing evidence from cohort studies to suggest that these adverse effects include ones not tr…”
ResultImproving the quality of medication use in elderly patients: a not-so-simple prescription.
Gurwitz, J., & Rochon, P. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.15.1670 · Cited by 130
Medication Undertreatment in Assisted Living Settings
Sloane, P. D., Gruber‐Baldini, A. L., Zimmerman, S. I., Roth, M. T., Watson, L. C., Boustani, M. A., Magaziner, J. S., & Hebel, J. R. (2004) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.164.18.2031 · Cited by 120
Zulman, D. M., Kerr, E. A., Hofer, T. P., Heisler, M., & Zikmund‐Fisher, B. J. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1232-1 · Cited by 103 · cited 1×
“Disagreement between patients or caregivers and clinicians regarding the goals for an individual patient’s care has also been demonstrated quantitatively.(22,23) Although the authors of these studies suggest that these findings indicate a lack of clinicians’ awareness of the patient’s priorities, the clinicians in the…”
BackgroundA Patient‐Centered Approach to Advance Medical Planning in the Nursing Home
Gillick, M., Berkman, S., & Cullen, L. (1999) · Journal of The American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb04582.x · Cited by 70
Goals for the care of frail older adults: do caregivers and clinicians agree?
Bogardus, S. T., Bradley, E. H., Williams, C. S., Maciejewski, P. K., van Doorn, C., & Inouye, S. K. (2001) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00668-9 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“Disagreement between patients or caregivers and clinicians regarding the goals for an individual patient’s care has also been demonstrated quantitatively.(22,23) Although the authors of these studies suggest that these findings indicate a lack of clinicians’ awareness of the patient’s priorities, the clinicians in the…”
BackgroundIndividualized Medical Decision Making: Necessary, Achievable, but Not Yet Attainable
Fraenkel, L., & Fried, T. (2010) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.8 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“Second, the clinicians who discussed the absence of risk calculators for patients with multiple conditions highlight the need for the development of methods to provide individualized assessments of harm vs benefit associated with different treatment strategies in order to determine optimal therapy depending on a patie…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHealth care quality and multimorbidity: the jury is still out.
Ritchie, C. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318074d3c1 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“benefits and harms associated with guideline-directed care reflects the ongoing uncertainty regarding the clinical strategies that will provide the best outcomes.(16) In addition to the studies demonstrating the risk of adverse outcomes associated with guideline-directed care, evidence also suggests that the patients…”
BackgroundAre Co-Morbidities Associated with Guideline Adherence? The MI-Plus Study of Medicare Patients
Sales, A., Tipton, E. F., Levine, D., Houston, T., Kim, Y., Allison, J., & Kiefe, C. (2009) · Journal of general internal medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1096-4 · Cited by 38
Primary Prevention Drug Therapy: Can It Meet Patients' Requirements for Reduced Risk?
Naylor, C. D., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., Paterson, J. M., Carter, J. A., Basinski, A., Myers, M. G., Hardacre, G. D., Dunn, E. V., D'Agostino, R. B., & Wolf, P. A. (2002) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x0202200411 · Cited by 21 · cited 1×
“However, some studies have demonstrated that, when presented with numerical data regarding risk reduction, many patients would be willing to take medication only if the amount of risk reduction exceeded the actual benefit provided by commonly prescribed therapies.(18,19) Moreover, other clinicians noted that the reduc…”
BackgroundSeniors' preferences for cancer screening and medication use based on absolute risk reduction.
Murphy, D., Gahm, G., Santilli, S., North, P., Oliver, S., & Shapiro, H. (2002) · The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/57.2.m100 · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“However, some studies have demonstrated that, when presented with numerical data regarding risk reduction, many patients would be willing to take medication only if the amount of risk reduction exceeded the actual benefit provided by commonly prescribed therapies.(18,19) Moreover, other clinicians noted that the reduc…”
BackgroundAssessing Multiple Medication Use With Probabilities of Benefits and Harms
Murphy, T., Agostini, J. V., van Ness, P. V., Peduzzi, P., Tinetti, M., & Allore, H. (2008) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/0898264308321006 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“Second, the clinicians who discussed the absence of risk calculators for patients with multiple conditions highlight the need for the development of methods to provide individualized assessments of harm vs benefit associated with different treatment strategies in order to determine optimal therapy depending on a patie…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [13]Rosenfeld KE Wenger NS Kagawa-Singer M End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals J Gen Intern Med 2000 15 9 620 5 11029675 PMC1495587
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barnett, K., Mercer, S. W., Norbury, M., Watt, G., Wyke, S., & Guthrie, B. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2 · Cited by 6,972
Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature
Marengoni, A., Angleman, S., Melis, R., Mangialasche, F., Karp, A., Garmen, A., Meinow, B., & Fratiglioni, L. (2011) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003 · Cited by 3,092
Designing Health Care for the Most Common Chronic Condition—Multimorbidity
Tinetti, M. E., Fried, T. R., & Boyd, C. M. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5265 · Cited by 1,005
“Physicians recognize the limitations of focusing on managementof individualdiseases in thecareofpatientswithmultiple chronic conditions.(9) In addition to restructuring how care is deliveredandpaidfor,physiciansneednewtoolsandappropriate datatomaketherightdecisionsforindividualpatientswithmultiple chronic conditions (…”
Self-citationAnderson, K., Stowasser, D. A., Freeman, C. R., & Scott, I. A. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006544 · Cited by 740
Guiding Principles for the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity: An Approach for Clinicians
American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04188.x · Cited by 681
“The individual treatment options are considered in terms of their effects on each of these outcomes, so that a treatment can be selected according to its likelihood of achieving the patient’s most-desired outcome or avoiding the least-desired outcome.(21,22) There are several additional considerations for clinicians t…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fried, T. R., Tinetti, M. E., & Iannone, L.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-09-13
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-80
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3021478
- OpenAlex
- W2012018261
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University (P30AG21342)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (K24AG028443, P30 AG21342, P30AG021342)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- treatment decision-making, older adults, multimorbidity, primary care providers, guideline-directed care, medication adherence, benefits and harms, shared decision-making, barriers to decision-making, reimbursement, clinician beliefs
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Connecticut, Decision Making, Female, Goals, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Patient Compliance, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physician Assistants, Primary Health Care, Residence Characteristics, United States, Comorbidity, Focus Groups, Narration, Qualitative Research, Medication Adherence, Physicians, Primary Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review