Patients Treated at Multiple Acute Health Care Facilities: Quantifying Information Fragmentation
Abstract
Background Fragmentation of medical information places patients at risk for medical errors, adverse events, duplication of tests, and increased costs. We sought to quantify, at the population level, the burden of fragmentation in the acute care setting across the state of Massachusetts by measuring the rates at which individuals seek care across multiple sites. Methods A retrospective observational study of all adult patients with at least 2 visits or hospitalizations to the emergency departments, inpatient units, and observation units in Massachusetts from October 1, 2002, to September 30, 2007. Results The 3,692,178 adult patients who visited an acute care site during our study period accounted for 12,758,498 acute care visits. A total of 1,130,124 adult patients (31%) visited 2 or more hospitals during the study period, accounting for 56.5% of all acute care visits, while a subgroup of 43,794 patients (1%) visited 5 or more hospitals, contributing to almost one-tenth of all acute visits. Patients who visited multiple sites were younger (P Conclusions A large number of patients seek care at multiple acute care sites. These findings provide one basis for assessing the value of an integrated electronic health information system for clinicians caring for patients across sites of care and therefore the return on investment in health information technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HIE infrastructures are ideal for developing registries because they typically curate many records for multiple populations drawn from varied sources across health systems, attenuating the common problem of data fragmentation plaguing retrospective database studies.
“HIE infrastructures are ideal for developing registries because they typically curate many records for multiple populations drawn from varied sources across health systems, attenuating the common problem of data fragmentation plaguing retrospective database studies [33, 34].”
From Evolution of clinical Health Information Exchanges to population health resources: a case study of the Indiana network for patient care (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Lang, E. (2006) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.050698 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hersh, W. R., Weiner, M. G., Embi, P. J., Logan, J. R., Payne, P. R. O., Bernstam, E. V., Lehmann, H. P., Hripcsak, G., Hartzog, T. H., Cimino, J. J., et al. (2013) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1dbd · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Wei, W.-Q., Teixeira, P. L., Mo, H., Cronin, R. M., Warner, J. L., & Denny, J. C. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv130 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record: Opportunities and Challenges
Shah, S. M., & Khan, R. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3011099 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Biases introduced by filtering electronic health records for patients with “complete data.”
Weber, G. M., Adams, W. G., Bernstam, E. V., Bickel, J. P., Fox, K. P., Marsolo, K., Raghavan, V. A., Turchin, A., Zhou, X., Murphy, S. N., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx071 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Interoperability among hospitals treating populations that have been marginalized
Everson, J., Patel, V., Bazemore, A. W., & Phillips, R. L. (2023) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.14165 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Schleyer, T., Hui, S., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Knapp, K., Baker, J., Chase, M., Boggs, R., & Simpson, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.5.544 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care
Apathy, N. C., Sanner, L., Adams, M. C. B., Mamlin, B. W., Grout, R. W., Fortin, S., Hillstrom, J., Saha, A., Teal, E., Vest, J. R., et al. (2022) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac074 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Williams, K. S., Rahurkar, S., Grannis, S. J., Schleyer, T. K., & Dixon, B. E. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-02933-9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bourgeois, F. C.
- Affiliations
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bourgeois, Fabienne C.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-12-13
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1989
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127791615
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (P01HK000088-01, P01HK000016)
- U.S. Public Health Service (T32HP10018-12)
- National Center for Research Resources (1U54RR025224-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Keywords
- care fragmentation, acute care, emergency department visits, hospital readmission, health information technology, electronic health records, medical errors, health care costs, Massachusetts
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Medical Records Systems, Computerized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review