Cited by 140Electronic Health Records SystemsHospital Admissions and OutcomesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Patients Treated at Multiple Acute Health Care Facilities: Quantifying Information Fragmentation

Bourgeois, Fabienne C.·2010·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Fragmentation of medical information places patients at risk for medical errors, adverse events, duplication of tests, and increased costs. We sought to quantify, at the population level, the burden of fragmentation in the acute care setting across the state of Massachusetts by measuring the rates at which individuals seek care across multiple sites. Methods A retrospective observational study of all adult patients with at least 2 visits or hospitalizations to the emergency departments, inpatient units, and observation units in Massachusetts from October 1, 2002, to September 30, 2007. Results The 3,692,178 adult patients who visited an acute care site during our study period accounted for 12,758,498 acute care visits. A total of 1,130,124 adult patients (31%) visited 2 or more hospitals during the study period, accounting for 56.5% of all acute care visits, while a subgroup of 43,794 patients (1%) visited 5 or more hospitals, contributing to almost one-tenth of all acute visits. Patients who visited multiple sites were younger (P Conclusions A large number of patients seek care at multiple acute care sites. These findings provide one basis for assessing the value of an integrated electronic health information system for clinicians caring for patients across sites of care and therefore the return on investment in health information technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.439

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HIE infrastructures are ideal for developing registries because they typically curate many records for multiple populations drawn from varied sources across health systems, attenuating the common problem of data fragmentation plaguing retrospective database studies.

    “HIE infrastructures are ideal for developing registries because they typically curate many records for multiple populations drawn from varied sources across health systems, attenuating the common problem of data fragmentation plaguing retrospective database studies [33, 34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourgeois, F. C.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Bourgeois, Fabienne C.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2010-12-13
Volume
170
Issue
22
Pages
1989
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127791615
Cited by
140
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (P01HK000088-01, P01HK000016)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (T32HP10018-12)
  • National Center for Research Resources (1U54RR025224-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
care fragmentation, acute care, emergency department visits, hospital readmission, health information technology, electronic health records, medical errors, health care costs, Massachusetts
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review