Cited by 93Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationMachine Learning in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biases introduced by filtering electronic health records for patients with “complete data.”

Open access

Abstract

Objective: One promise of nationwide adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is the availability of data for large-scale clinical research studies. However, because the same patient could be treated at multiple health care institutions, data from only a single site might not contain the complete medical history for that patient, meaning that critical events could be missing. In this study, we evaluate how simple heuristic checks for data “completeness” affect the number of patients in the resulting cohort and introduce potential biases. Materials and Methods: We began with a set of 16 filters that check for the presence of demographics, laboratory tests, and other types of data, and then systematically applied all 216 possible combinations of these filters to the EHR data for 12 million patients at 7 health care systems and a separate payor claims database of 7 million members. Results: EHR data showed considerable variability in data completeness across sites and high correlation between data types. For example, the fraction of patients with diagnoses increased from 35.0% in all patients to 90.9% in those with at least 1 medication. An unrelated claims dataset independently showed that most filters select members who are older and more likely female and can eliminate large portions of the population whose data are actually complete. Discussion and Conclusion: As investigators design studies, they need to balance their confidence in the completeness of the data with the effects of placing requirements on the data on the resulting patient cohort.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocx071

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Filtering for "complete" EHRs, a common strategy for managing missing data, introduced a bias toward older patients who were more likely female.

    “work by Weber et al. found that simply filtering for “complete” EHRs, a common strategy for managing missing data, introduced a bias toward older patients who were more likely female (50).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weber, G. M., Adams, W. G., Bernstam, E. V., Bickel, J. P., Fox, K. P., Marsolo, K., Raghavan, V. A., Turchin, A., Zhou, X., Murphy, S. N., & Mandl, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Aetna (United States) (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Weber, Griffin M
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1134-1141
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2741416490
Cited by
93
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5R01GM104303)
  • National Institutes of Health (U54HG007963, U01CA198934)
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CDRN130604608)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
electronic health records, data completeness, data filtering, selection bias, claims data
MeSH terms
Data Accuracy, Humans, Insurance Claim Reporting, Bias, Information Storage and Retrieval, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review