The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug-Eluting vs Bare-Metal Stents in Primary Angioplasty: A Pooled Patient-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Concerns have emerged regarding a higher risk of stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, especially in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis using individual patient data to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of DES compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. DATA SOURCES: Formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) and scientific session presentations from January 2000 to June 2011. STUDY SELECTION: We examined all completed randomized trials of DES for STEMI. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual patient data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Individual patient data were obtained from 11 of 13 trials identified, including a total of 6298 patients (3980 [63.2%] randomized to DES [99% sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents] and 2318 [36.8%] randomized to BMS). At long-term follow-up (mean [SD], 1201 [440] days), DES implantation significantly reduced the occurrence of target-vessel revascularization (12.7% vs 20.1%; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.57 [0.50-0.66]; P < .001, P value for heterogeneity, .20), without any significant difference in terms of mortality, reinfarction, and stent thrombosis. However, DES implantation was associated with an increased risk of very late stent thrombosis and reinfarction. CONCLUSIONS: The present pooled patient-level meta-analysis demonstrates that among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents compared with BMS are associated with a significant reduction in target-vessel revascularization at long-term follow-up. Although there were no differences in cumulative mortality, reinfarction, or stent thrombosis, the incidence of very late reinfarction and stent thrombosis was increased with these DES.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Wallentin, L., Becker, R. C., Budaj, A., Cannon, C. P., Emanuelsson, H., Held, C., Horrow, J., Husted, S., James, S., Katus, H., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0904327 · Cited by 7,117
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Wiviott, S. D., Braunwald, E., McCabe, C. H., Montalescot, G., Ruzyllo, W., Gottlieb, S., Neumann, F.-J., Ardissino, D., De Servi, S., Murphy, S. A., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0706482 · Cited by 6,790
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Cited by
(2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278 · Cited by 4,314
Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation
Zhang, J., Gao, X., Kan, J., Ge, Z., Han, L., Lu, S., Tian, N., Lin, S., Lu, Q., Wu, X., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013 · Cited by 665
Gilard, M., Barragan, P., Noryani, A. A. L., Noor, H. A., Majwal, T., Hovasse, T., Castellant, P., Schneeberger, M., Maillard, L., Bressolette, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.008 · Cited by 360
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Windecker, S., Kolh, P., Alfonso, F., Collet, J.-P., Cremer, J., Falk, V., Filippatos, G., Hamm, C., Head, S. J., Jüni, P., et al. (2015) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eijy14m09_01 · Cited by 328
Bangalore, S., Toklu, B., Amoroso, N., Fusaro, M., Kumar, S., Hannan, E. L., Faxon, D. P., & Feit, F. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f6625 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- De Luca, G., Dirksen, M. T., Spaulding, C., Kelbæk, H., Schalij, M., Thuesen, L., van der Hoeven, B., Vink, M. A., Kaiser, C., Musto, C., Chechi, T., Spaziani, G., Díaz de la Llera, L. S., Pasceri, V., Di Lorenzo, E., Violini, R., Cortese, G., Suryapranata, H., Stone, G. W., & Cooperation, F. T. D.-E. S. I. P. A. (.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2012-04-23
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 611-21; discussion 621
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151107953
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 42.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug-Eluting vs Bare-Metal Stents in Primary Angioplasty: A Pooled Patient-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.758
- The paper
- De Luca, G., Dirksen, M. T., Spaulding, C., Kelbæk, H., Schalij, M., Thuesen, L., van der Hoeven, B., Vink, M. A., Kaiser, C., Musto, C., Chechi, T., Spaziani, G., Díaz de la Llera, L. S., Pasceri, V., Di Lorenzo, E., Violini, R., Cortese, G., Suryapranata, H., Stone, G. W., & Cooperation, F. T. D.-E. S. I. P. A. (. (2012). Drug-Eluting vs Bare-Metal Stents in Primary Angioplasty: A Pooled Patient-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.