Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Progress in Brain Research, vol 16.

Costa, E.·1966·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

In general, books collecting review articles of a particular field fall into one of two categories. They may summarize the literature pertinent to this field with the object of presenting a reasonably complete picture of what has been done and why. Alternatively, the book may consist of highly selective reviews which reflect the literature that emphasizes the contributions of the author. Often the author's work is, indeed, the major part of the review article. In the latter instance the onus rests on the author to explicate and justify the criteria adopted. Unlike the other publications in this series, vol 16 ofProgress in Brain Researchfalls in neither category, for each of its 25 papers reveals how the activity of the Thudicum Psychiatric Research Laboratory of Galesburg, Ill, has contributed to widening the horizons of neuropsychiatric research. In fact, all the authors contributing to this volume have been, or are,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1966.00470070120024

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Costa, E.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1966-01-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
116-117
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974512484
Cited by
498
References
0
FWCI
38.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in Brain Research, vol 16. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1966.00470070120024
The paper
Costa, E. (1966). Progress in Brain Research, vol 16. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1966.00470070120024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.