The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparisons of Verbal Fluency Tasks in the Detection of Dementia of the Alzheimer Type
Abstract
The performances of 89 patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) and 53 demographically matched elderly normal control subjects were compared on four verbal fluency measures (category, letter, first names, and supermarket fluency). Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to determine each fluency tasks' sensitivity (ie, true-positive rate) and specificity (ie, true-negative rate). Category fluency demonstrated the greatest degree of discrimination between patients with DAT and normal control subjects (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 92.5%); letter fluency was the least accurate (sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 85%). Separation of patients with DAT by gender revealed similar findings. In further analyses with a subgroup of 21 mildly impaired patients with DAT, category fluency lost none of its discriminative capabilities, whereas all other fluency measures showed marked reductions in discriminability. We conclude that this superiority of category fluency is due to its dependence on the structure of semantic knowledge, which deteriorates in the early stages of DAT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Cited by
A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia
Mathuranath, P. S., Nestor, P. J., Berrios, G. E., Rakowicz, W., & Hodges, J. R. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000434309.85312.19 · Cited by 1,029
Grundman, M. (2004) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.61.1.59 · Cited by 972
Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a meta-analysis
Henry, J. D., Crawford, J. R., & Phillips, L. H. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.001 · Cited by 847
Linguistic Features Identify Alzheimer’s Disease in Narrative Speech
Fraser, K. C., Meltzer, J. A., & Rudzicz, F. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-150520 · Cited by 797
Norms for Letter and Category Fluency: Demographic Corrections for Age, Education, and Ethnicity
Gladsjo, J. A., Schuman, C. C., Evans, J. D., Peavy, G. M., Miller, S. W., & Heaton, R. K. (1999) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/107319119900600204 · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Monsch, A. U., Bondi, M. W., Butters, N., Salmon, D. P., Katzman, R., & Thal, L. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1253-1258
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978063188
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparisons of Verbal Fluency Tasks in the Detection of Dementia of the Alzheimer Type. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1992.00530360051017
- The paper
- Monsch, A. U., Bondi, M. W., Butters, N., Salmon, D. P., Katzman, R., & Thal, L. J. (1992). Comparisons of Verbal Fluency Tasks in the Detection of Dementia of the Alzheimer Type. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1992.00530360051017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.