The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aspiration and Relative Risk of Medical Complications Following Stroke
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative risk of pneumonia, dehydration, and death associated with videofluoroscopic evidence of aspiration, silent aspiration, aspiration of 10% or greater on one or more barium test swallows, and aspiration of thick liquid or more solid consistencies in the subacute phase after stroke. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. PATIENTS: There were 114 consecutive patients who met the following criteria: (1) stroke as defined by clinical history and neurological examination with compatible computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scan; (2) age 20 to 90 years, inclusive; (3) no known history of significant oropharyngeal anomaly; and (4) videofluoroscopic evidence of dysphagia. Of 122 eligible patients, eight refused participation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of pneumonia, dehydration, and death. RESULTS: The relative risk for developing pneumonia was 6.95 times greater (P = .027) for those patients who aspirated compared with those who did not, 5.57 times greater (P = .012) for those who aspirated silently compared with those who coughed when aspirating or who did not aspirate, and 8.36 times greater (P = .002) for those who aspirated 10% or greater on one or more barium test swallows compared with those who aspirated less than 10% or did not aspirate. CONCLUSION: Aspiration, silent aspiration, and aspiration of 10% or greater on one or more barium test swallows during videofluoroscopic evaluation are associated with an increased risk of pneumonia, but not dehydration or death, during the subacute phase after stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Medical Complications After Stroke: A Multicenter Study
Langhorne, P., Stott, D. J., Robertson, L., MacDonald, J., Jones, L., McAlpine, C., Dick, F., Taylor, G. S., & Murray, G. (2000) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.31.6.1223 · Cited by 1,196
Medical complications after stroke
Kumar, S., Selim, M. H., & Caplan, L. R. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70266-2 · Cited by 601
Effect of Malnutrition After Acute Stroke on Clinical Outcome
Dávalos, A., Ricart, W., Gonzalez-Huix, F., Soler, S., Marrugat, J., Molins, A., Suñer, R., & Genís, D. (1996) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.27.6.1028 · Cited by 494
Guideline clinical nutrition in patients with stroke
The DGEM Steering Committee*, Wirth, R., Smoliner, C., Jäger, M., Warnecke, T., Leischker, A. H., & Dziewas, R. (2013) · Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine · doi:10.1186/2040-7378-5-14 · Cited by 160
Swallowing Dysfunction After Critical Illness
Macht, M., White, S. D., & Moss, M. (2014) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.14-1133 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Holas, M. A., DePippo, K. L., & Reding, M. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1051-1053
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090542408
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspiration and Relative Risk of Medical Complications Following Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1994.00540220099020
- The paper
- Holas, M. A., DePippo, K. L., & Reding, M. J. (1994). Aspiration and Relative Risk of Medical Complications Following Stroke. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1994.00540220099020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.