The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale: Assessment of Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Abstract
Objectives: To test the utility of a new, easy to administer instrument for assessing activities of daily living in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), to validate its accuracy, and to assess its ability to record disease progression in patients with ALS against other functional scales, quantitative isometric muscle testing, and global assessment scales. Design: Serial assessments of patients who presented to four ALS treatment centers in two multicenter studies. Patients: Study I (cross-sectional) evaluated 75 consecutive patients who presented to four ALS treatment centers during a 2-month period. Study 2 (longitudinal) evaluated the progression of 53 patients who were enrolled in a multicenter, phase I-II clinical trial of recombinant human ciliary neurotrophic factor for treatment of ALS. Outcome Measures: The ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) was compared with quantitative myometry and with other measures of daily function in patients with ALS both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Results: The first study of 75 patients evaluated the internal consistency, the test-retest reliability, and the construct validity of the ALSFRS. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high. Patient self-rating of upper- and lower-extremity—dependent tasks were highly correlated with measures of upper- and lower-extremity strength, respectively. Thus, the ALSFRS has good construct validity. In the second study, ALSFRS scores declined in tandem with deterioration in motor and pulmonary function, indicating its sensitivity to change. Conclusions: The ALSFRS is a useful instrument for evaluation of functional status and functional change in patients with ALS. Its results are in close agreement with objective measures of muscle strength and pulmonary function. The ALSFRS may be used as a screening measure for entry into clinical trials, as a surrogate measure of function in situations in which muscle strength cannot be measured directly, or as an adjunct to myometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cedarbaum, J. M., Stambler, N., Malta, E., Fuller, C., Hilt, D., Thurmond, B., & Nakanishi, A. (1999) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00210-5 · Cited by 3,307
Applications of machine learning to diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases
Myszczynska, M. A., Ojamies, P. N., Lacoste, A. M. B., Neil, D., Saffari, A., Mead, R., Hautbergue, G. M., Holbrook, J. D., & Ferraiuolo, L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0377-8 · Cited by 595
Mitchell, J., & Borasio, G. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60944-1 · Cited by 561
Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A Phase I clinical trial
Mazzini, L., Ferrero, I., Luparello, V., Rustichelli, D., Gunetti, M., Mareschi, K., Testa, L., Stecco, A., Tarletti, R., Miglioretti, M., et al. (2010) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.08.007 · Cited by 396
Resilience and Distress Among Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients and Caregivers
Rabkin, J. G., Wagner, G. J., & Del Bene, M. (2000) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200003000-00020 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4237126259
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale: Assessment of Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1996.00550020045014
- The paper
- The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale: Assessment of Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. (1996). Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1996.00550020045014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.