Cited by 288Cancer survivorship and careAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNursing care and research

Resilience and Distress Among Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients and Caregivers

Rabkin, Judith G., Wagner, Glenn J., Del Bene, Maura·2000·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of depressive disorders and symptoms and their correlates in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and caregiver spouses and to identify dimensions of resilience as well as distress. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with ALS and 31 caregivers were interviewed on one occasion, and 20 patients were subsequently reinterviewed during a scheduled medical visit at an ALS center. Major measures included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death, quality of life, spirituality, and degree of hopelessness. The ALS Functional Rating Scale, spirometry measures of forced vital capacity, and the Karnofsky Performance Index were used to assess physical status. RESULTS: Neither patients nor caregivers displayed significant psychopathology with respect to either current depressive disorders or scores on symptom scales. Depressive symptoms and psychological distress were not related to time since diagnosis, degree of disability, or illness progression during the period of observation. More interest in hastened death was associated with greater distress, but willingness to consider assisted suicide was not. Among caregivers, perceived caregiver burden was significantly associated with finding positive meaning in caregiving. Concordance between patient and caregiver distress was high, suggesting that attention to the mental health needs of caregivers may alleviate the patient's distress as well. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical depression or significant depressive symptomatology is not an inevitable or common outcome of life-threatening illness, even in the presence of major disability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006842-200003000-00020

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rabkin, J. G., Wagner, G. J., & Del Bene, M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2000-03
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
271-279
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981151802
Cited by
288
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, resilience, psychological distress, depressive symptoms, caregiver burden, assisted suicide, hopelessness, quality of life, spirituality, disease progression, disability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Attitude to Health, Depression, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Caregivers, Suicide, Assisted, Karnofsky Performance Status, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review