The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principles of Nuclear Medicine
Abstract
This second addition of Wagner'sPrinciples of Nuclear Medicinehas been a long time coming. This should be a welcomed new member of a library for any individual who is practicing, studying, or teaching nuclear medicine. The growth of the physical size of the text mirrors the growth of nuclear medicine. The editors are to be congratulated by blending the contributions from a large number of authors into a single comprehensive volume that is an excellent source of valuable information. The sections on basic science, radiation safety, radiation accidents, and low-level radioactive waste are of particular excellence. All sections are well organized, as succinct as possible, and fully covered, and also attempt to predict current basic approaches. In the clinical chapters of the text is a major emphasis on utilization of the basic science portions in a clinical problem-solving mode. This approach is well founded and fills a necessity in
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Muehllehner, G., & Karp, J. S. (2006) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/r08 · Cited by 288
Rosa-Neto, P., Lou, H. C., Cumming, P., Pryds, O., Karrebaek, H., Lunding, J., & Gjedde, A. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.031 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Mara, R. E.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 721-721
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060877858
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Nuclear Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1996.00550080031008
- The paper
- O'Mara, R. E. (1996). Principles of Nuclear Medicine. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1996.00550080031008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
