The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Is the Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy?: A Clinicopathologic Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presentation of symptoms for multiple system atrophy (MSA) varies. Because there are no specific markers for its clinical diagnosis, the diagnosis rests on the results of the neuropathologic examination. Despite several clinicopathologic studies, the diagnostic accuracy for MSA is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy for the clinical diagnosis of MSA and to identify, as early as possible, those features that would best predict MSA. DESIGN: One hundred five autopsy-confirmed cases of MSA and related disorders (MSA [n=16], non-MSA [n=89]) were presented as clinical vignettes to 6 neurologists (raters) who were unaware of the study design. Raters identified the main clinical features and provided a diagnosis based on descriptions of the patients' first and last clinic visits. METHODS: Interrater reliability was evaluated with the use of kappa statistics. Raters' diagnoses and those of the primary neurologists (who followed up the patients) were compared with the autopsy-confirmed diagnoses to estimate the sensitivity and positive predictive values at the patients' first and last visits. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the best predictors to diagnose MSA. RESULTS: For the first visit (median, 42 months after the onset of symptoms), the raters' sensitivity (median, 56%; range, 50%-69%) and positive predictive values (median, 76%; range, 61%-91%) for the clinical diagnosis of MSA were not optimal. For the last visit (74 months after the onset of symptoms), the raters' sensitivity (median, 69%; range, 56%-94%) and positive predictive values (median, 80%; range, 77%-92%) improved. Primary neurologists correctly identified 25% and 50% of the patients with MSA at the first and last visits, respectively. False-negative and -positive misdiagnoses frequently occurred in patients with Parkinson disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Early severe autonomic failure, absence of cognitive impairment, early cerebellar symptoms, and early gait disturbances were identified as the best predictive features to diagnose MSA. CONCLUSIONS: The low sensitivity for the clinical diagnosis of MSA, particularly among neurologists who followed up these patients in the tertiary centers, suggests that this disorder is underdiagnosed. The misdiagnosis of MSA is usually due to its confusion with Parkinson disease or progressive supranuclear palsy, thus compromising the research on all 3 disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 · Cited by 12,107
McKeith, I. G., Galasko, D., Kosaka, K., Perry, E. K., Dickson, D. W., Hansen, L. A., Salmon, D. P., Lowe, J., Mirra, S. S., Byrne, E. J., et al. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.5.1113 · Cited by 3,960
Litvan, I., Agid, Y., Calne, D., Campbell, G., Dubois, B., Duvoisin, R. C., Goetz, C. G., Golbe, L. I., Grafman, J., Growdon, J. H., et al. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.1.1 · Cited by 2,538
Self-citationPapp, M. I., Kahn, J. E., & Lantos, P. L. (1989) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(89)90219-0 · Cited by 991
Papp, M. I., & Lantos, P. L. (1994) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/117.2.235 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy
Gilman, S., Wenning, G. K., Low, P. A., Brooks, D. J., Mathias, C. J., Trojanowski, J. Q., Wood, N. W., Colosimo, C., Dürr, A., Fowler, C. J., et al. (2008) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15 · Cited by 3,140
Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson Disease
Gelb, D. J., Oliver, E., & Gilman, S. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.1.33 · Cited by 2,822
Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy
Gilman, S., Low, P., Quinn, N., Albanese, A., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Fowler, C., Kaufmann, H., Klockgether, T., Lang, A., Lantos, P., et al. (1998) · Clinical Autonomic Research · doi:10.1007/bf02309628 · Cited by 1,308
Self-citationThe accuracy of diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes in a specialist movement disorder service
Hughes, A. J., Daniel, S. E., Ben‐Shlomo, Y., & Lees, A. J. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf080 · Cited by 1,251
Bertholon, P. (2002) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.72.3.366 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Litvan, I.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 937
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162337683
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Is the Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy?: A Clinicopathologic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550200007003
- The paper
- Litvan, I. (1997). What Is the Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy?: A Clinicopathologic Study. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550200007003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.