Cited by 991Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurological diseases and metabolism

Glial cytoplasmic inclusions in the CNS of patients with multiple system atrophy (striatonigral degeneration, olivopontocerebellar atrophy and Shy-Drager syndrome)

Papp, Matyas I., Kahn, Jacob E., Lantos, Peter L.·1989·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Glial cytoplasmic inclusions (GCIs) were demonstrated by silver staining, immunocytochemistry and by electron microscopy in the central nervous system (CNS) of 11 patients with various combinations of striatonigral degeneration, olivopontocerebellar atrophy and Shy-Drager syndrome. Although their configuration in light microscope can sometimes resemble neurofibrillary tangles, their cellular localisation, measurements, ultrastructure, immunocytochemical characteristics and regional distribution all differ from these Alzheimer type changes. The majority of GCIs were localized in the white matter and appeared to be accompanied by an increase in the number of interfascicular oligodendroglial cells and pallor or loss of myelin staining. Our histological, ultrastructural and immunocytochemical findings all indicate that the cells which contain GCIs are oligodendrocytes and the inclusions themselves are composed of tubular structures. The presence of the until now unknown GCIs in all the 11 CNS, but not in age- and sex-matched control brains, indicates that GCI is a cellular change characteristic of multiple system atrophy and the three syndromes are various manifestations of the same disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-510x(89)90219-0

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papp, M. I., Kahn, J. E., & Lantos, P. L.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-12
Volume
94
Issue
1-3
Pages
79-100
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090048744
Cited by
991
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
Keywords
glial cytoplasmic inclusions, multiple system atrophy, striatonigral degeneration, olivopontocerebellar atrophy, Shy-Drager syndrome, oligodendrocytes, white matter, demyelination, neurofibrillary tangles, ultrastructure, immunocytochemistry, central nervous system pathology
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Inclusion Bodies, Corpus Striatum, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuroglia, Olivopontocerebellar Atrophies, Shy-Drager Syndrome, Spinocerebellar Degenerations, Substantia Nigra

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review