The Utility of Apolipoprotein E Genotyping in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease in a Community-Based Case Series
Abstract
Context A recent collaborative study found that apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, in conjunction with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD), was useful in improving diagnostic specificity (correctly not diagnosing AD) relative to the clinical diagnosis alone. Since these samples are particularly enriched with patients with AD and the APOE epsilon4 allele, results may not be generalizable to patients seen in the general medical community. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the APOE genotype in diagnosing AD in a community-based case series from the largest health maintenance organization in an urban area. Design We examined the effect of including APOE genotype on the diagnosis of AD in a community-based case series of patients presenting with memory complaints. Patients Clinical and neuropathologic diagnoses and APOE genotype were obtained from 132 patients who underwent evaluation for dementia and subsequent autopsy. Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values given various combinations of clinical diagnoses and the presence of an APOE epsilon4 allele. Results Of the 132 patients, 94 had neuropathologically confirmed AD, yielding a prevalence of 71%. The clinical diagnosis alone yielded a sensitivity of 84%, an estimated specificity of 50%, and positive and negative predictive values of 81% and 56%, respectively. The presence of an epsilon4 allele alone was associated with an estimated sensitivity of 59%…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The last diagnostic accuracy studies utilizing a complete ADC dataset were performed in 1998 and 1999.
“the last diagnostic accuracy studies utilizing a complete ADC dataset were performed in 1998 and 1999 (4, 23)”
From Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005–2010 (2012) · cites this paper as [23]
There is relatively close agreement with the last 2 prior assessments using total NIA-ADC dataset: Mayeux et al estimated sensitivity 93% and specificity 55% and Tsuang et al reported sensitivity 84% and specificity 50%.
“There is also relatively close agreement with the last 2 prior assessments of diagnostic accuracy using the total NIA-ADC dataset: Mayeux et al estimated a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 55% (4) and Tsuang et al reported a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 50% (23).”
From Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005–2010 (2012) · cites this paper as [23]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Tsuang, D., Larson, E. B., Bowen, J., McCormick, W., Teri, L., Nochlin, D., Leverenz, J. B., Peskind, E. R., Lim, A., Raskind, M. A., Thompson, M. L., Mirra, S. S., Gearing, M., Schellenberg, G. D., & Kukull, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
- Emory University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1489
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006311962
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG010845, U01-AG-06781, U01AG006781, R01-AG10845, U01AG10130)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, genetic testing, diagnostic accuracy, diagnosis, memory impairment, dementia, neuropathology, diagnostic specificity, predictive value, community-based patients, health maintenance organizations, genetic risk factors, differential diagnosis of dementia, cognitive impairment in older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Female, Genetic Testing, Genotype, Health Maintenance Organizations, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review