Cited by 42Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The Utility of Apolipoprotein E Genotyping in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease in a Community-Based Case Series

Tsuang, Debby, Larson, Eric B., Bowen, James, McCormick, Wayne, Teri, Linda, Nochlin, David, Leverenz, James B., Peskind, Elaine R. +7 more·1999·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Context A recent collaborative study found that apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, in conjunction with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD), was useful in improving diagnostic specificity (correctly not diagnosing AD) relative to the clinical diagnosis alone. Since these samples are particularly enriched with patients with AD and the APOE epsilon4 allele, results may not be generalizable to patients seen in the general medical community. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the APOE genotype in diagnosing AD in a community-based case series from the largest health maintenance organization in an urban area. Design We examined the effect of including APOE genotype on the diagnosis of AD in a community-based case series of patients presenting with memory complaints. Patients Clinical and neuropathologic diagnoses and APOE genotype were obtained from 132 patients who underwent evaluation for dementia and subsequent autopsy. Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values given various combinations of clinical diagnoses and the presence of an APOE epsilon4 allele. Results Of the 132 patients, 94 had neuropathologically confirmed AD, yielding a prevalence of 71%. The clinical diagnosis alone yielded a sensitivity of 84%, an estimated specificity of 50%, and positive and negative predictive values of 81% and 56%, respectively. The presence of an epsilon4 allele alone was associated with an estimated sensitivity of 59%…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.56.12.1489

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 42

Authors
Tsuang, D., Larson, E. B., Bowen, J., McCormick, W., Teri, L., Nochlin, D., Leverenz, J. B., Peskind, E. R., Lim, A., Raskind, M. A., Thompson, M. L., Mirra, S. S., Gearing, M., Schellenberg, G. D., & Kukull, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
1489
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006311962
Cited by
42
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG010845, U01-AG-06781, U01AG006781, R01-AG10845, U01AG10130)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, genetic testing, diagnostic accuracy, diagnosis, memory impairment, dementia, neuropathology, diagnostic specificity, predictive value, community-based patients, health maintenance organizations, genetic risk factors, differential diagnosis of dementia, cognitive impairment in older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Female, Genetic Testing, Genotype, Health Maintenance Organizations, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review