Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subjects with a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have a memory impairment beyond that expected for age and education yet are not demented. These subjects are becoming the focus of many prediction studies and early intervention trials. OBJECTIVE: To characterize clinically subjects with MCI cross-sectionally and longitudinally. DESIGN: A prospective, longitudinal inception cohort. SETTING: General community clinic. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 76 consecutively evaluated subjects with MCI were compared with 234 healthy control subjects and 106 patients with mild Alzheimer disease (AD), all from a community setting as part of the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Center/Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry, Rochester, Minn. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 3 groups of individuals were compared on demographic factors and measures of cognitive function including the Mini-Mental State Examination, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, Dementia Rating Scale, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, and Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Clinical classifications of dementia and AD were determined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition and the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria, respectively. RESULTS: The primary distinction between control subjects and subjects with MCI was in the area of memory, while other cognitive functions were comparable. However, when the subjects with MCI were compared with the patients with very mild AD, memory performance was similar, but patients with AD were more impaired in other cognitive domains as well. Longitudinal performance demonstrated that the subjects with MCI declined at a rate greater than that of the controls but less rapidly than the patients with mild AD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who meet the criteria for MCI can be differentiated from healthy control subjects and those with very mild AD. They appear to constitute a clinical entity that can be characterized for treatment interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease was made in accordance with NINCDS-ADRCA criteria and mild cognitive impairment was diagnosed according to Mayo criteria.
“Diagnosis of AD was made in accordance with the NINCDS-ADRCA criteria (McKhann et al., 2011) and MCI was diagnosed according to the Mayo criteria (Petersen et al., 1999).”
From Mean diffusivity in cortical gray matter in Alzheimer's disease: The importance of partial volume correction (2018) · cites this paper as Petersen et al., 1999
Cognitive testing used a battery of well-validated, standardized, and widely used neuropsychological tests, but these explored only some aspects of the complex cognitive dysfunction in MCI.
“First, because standard MCI criteria do not define optimal tests to establish cognitive performance in subjects with MCI, 22 cognitive testing was performed using a battery of well-validated, standardized, and widely used neuropsychological tests exploring only some aspects of the complex cognitive dysfunction in subjects with MCI.1,2”
The intermediate state between normal cognition and Alzheimer's disease has been termed mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and clinical criteria for this diagnosis have been suggested.
“This intermediate state has been termed mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and clinical criteria for this diagnosis have been suggested(1–3).”
From Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD (2000) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 8,980
- Authors
- Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159122349
- Cited by
- 8,980
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 284 · 2025: 345 · 2024: 319 · 2023: 338 · 2022: 358 · 2021: 414 · 2020: 417 · 2019: 431 · 2018: 364 · 2017: 366 · 2016: 429 · 2015: 403 · 2014: 458 · 2013: 447 · 2012: 460
- FWCI
- 63.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG-08031, P30AG008031, AG-06786, U01AG006786)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, memory impairment, cognitive decline, dementia, clinical classification, longitudinal cognitive change, dementia risk prediction, early intervention
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Demography, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Prospective Studies, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review