The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pesticides and Risk of Parkinson Disease: A Population-Based Case-Control Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pesticide exposures are suspected risk factors for Parkinson disease (PD), but epidemiological observations have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between pesticide exposures and idiopathic PD. DESIGN: Population-based case-control study. SETTING: Group Health Cooperative, a health care system in western Washington State, and the University of Washington. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty incident PD case patients and 388 healthy control subjects (age- and sex-matched). We assessed self-reported pesticide exposures using a structured interview. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using logistic regression models, controlling for age, sex, and smoking. RESULTS: Odds ratios for occupational exposures were not significant but suggested a gradient that paralleled occupational exposures (pesticide worker: OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.67-6.38; crop farmer: OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.84-3.27; animal and crop farmer: OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.60-2.00; and dairy farmer: OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.46-1.70). Odds ratios for organophosphates paralleled the World Health Organization hazard classifications, with parathion much higher than diazinon or malathion. We also found elevated ORs from herbicides (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.51-3.88) and paraquat (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.22-12.76). We found no evidence of risk from home-based pesticide exposures. We found significantly increased ORs from lifelong well water consumption (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.02-3.21). CONCLUSIONS: The findings for occupational pesticide exposures are consistent with a growing body of information linking pesticide exposures with PD. However, the lack of significant associations, absence of associations with home-based exposures, and weak associations with rural exposures suggest that pesticides did not play a substantial etiologic role in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease
de Lau, L. M., & Breteler, M. M. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70471-9 · Cited by 4,110
An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment
Rani, L., Thapa, K., Kanojia, N., Sharma, N., Singh, S., Grewal, A. S., Srivastav, A. L., & Kaushal, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657 · Cited by 1,427
Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson's disease: a review of the evidence
Wirdefeldt, K., Adami, H.-O., Cole, P., Trichopoulos, D., & Mandel, J. (2011) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-011-9581-6 · Cited by 1,199
Pesticides: an update of human exposure and toxicity
Mostafalou, S., & Abdollahi, M. (2017) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1849-x · Cited by 786
Genetics of Parkinson disease: paradigm shifts and future prospects
Farrer, M. J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1831 · Cited by 707
Metadata
- Authors
- Firestone, J. A., Smith-Weller, T., Franklin, G., Swanson, P., Longstreth, W. T., & Checkoway, H.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083270499
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pesticides and Risk of Parkinson Disease: A Population-Based Case-Control Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.62.1.91
- The paper
- Firestone, J. A., Smith-Weller, T., Franklin, G., Swanson, P., Longstreth, W. T., & Checkoway, H. (2005). Pesticides and Risk of Parkinson Disease: A Population-Based Case-Control Study. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.1.91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.