Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Delayed Neurotoxicity in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Omuro, Antonio M. P., Ben-Porat, Leah S., Panageas, Katherine S., Kim, Amy K., Correa, Denise D., Yahalom, Joachim, DeAngelis, Lisa M., Abrey, Lauren E.·2005·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment for primary central nervous lymphoma (PCNSL) with chemotherapy and radiotherapy has resulted in improved survival, but some patients develop neurologic deterioration that represents a treatment-related toxic effect. This delayed neurotoxicity has been poorly defined in the literature, and the underlying mechanisms are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical findings, time course, and pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with neurotoxicity in an attempt to generate hypotheses for future studies that address prevention and treatment of this complication of successful PCNSL therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-five patients treated for PCNSL, including 43 who developed neurotoxicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Potential risk factors, clinical course, and neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and histologic findings. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of neurotoxicity was 24%; this incidence increases over time. Neurotoxicity presented as a rapidly progressive subcortical dementia characterized by psychomotor slowing, executive and memory dysfunction, behavioral changes, gait ataxia, and incontinence. Imaging findings revealed diffuse white matter disease and cortical-subcortical atrophy. Available autopsy data showed white matter damage with gliosis, thickening of small vessels, and demyelination. Statistical analyses were performed, accounting for death as a competing risk. Older age (P = .01), mental status changes at diagnosis (P = .04), female sex (P = .05), and radiotherapy (P<.001) predicted neurotoxicity on univariate analysis, but only radiotherapy remained significant in the multivariate setting. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the core pathophysiologic mechanism is the interruption of frontal-subcortical circuits mediated by radiation damage, possibly caused by progressive microvascular alterations, loss of oligodendrocyte progenitors, or oxidative stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.62.10.1595

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Omuro, A. M. P., Ben-Porat, L. S., Panageas, K. S., Kim, A. K., Correa, D. D., Yahalom, J., DeAngelis, L. M., & Abrey, L. E.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2005-10-01
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
1595-600
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010954300
Cited by
286
References
3
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed Neurotoxicity in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.62.10.1595
The paper
Omuro, A. M. P., Ben-Porat, L. S., Panageas, K. S., Kim, A. K., Correa, D. D., Yahalom, J., DeAngelis, L. M., & Abrey, L. E. (2005). Delayed Neurotoxicity in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.10.1595

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.