Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonlinear Progression of Parkinson Disease as Determined by Serial Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging of Striatal Fluorodopa F 18 Activity

Open access
Hilker, Ruediger, Schweitzer, Katherine, Coburger, Silke, Ghaemi, Mehran, Weisenbach, Simon, Jacobs, Andreas H., Rudolf, Jobst, Herholz, Karl, Heiss, Wolf-Dieter·2005·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The investigation of disease progression provides important information on the dynamics of cell death in Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the progression of dopaminergic impairment in PD with the use of positron emission tomography (PET). DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective cohort study with a follow-up period of 64.5 +/- 22.6 months (mean +/- SD). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of patients with PD (N = 31; age at symptom onset, 53.6 +/- 11.3 years) with a wide range of symptom duration and severity at the time of study entry. INTERVENTIONS: Investigation by serial fluorodopa F 18 ([(18)F]fluorodopa) PET as a marker for striatal dopaminergic function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in caudate and putaminal [(18)F]fluorodopa influx constant (K(i)) values. RESULTS: In patients with PD, the decline rate of putaminal [(18)F]fluorodopa K(i) correlated inversely with disease duration before study inclusion (r = -0.46, P = .01) and positively with baseline K(i) values (r = 0.44, P = .01), indicating a negative exponential loss of dopamine neurons. Annual disease progression rates ranged from 4.4% in the caudate nucleus to 6.3% in the putamen. A mean preclinical period of 5.6 +/- 3.2 years was calculated with symptom onset at a putaminal K(i) threshold of 69% from controls. Assuming nonlinear progression kinetics, the required sample size to prove neuroprotection with the use of [(18)F]fluorodopa PET was found to increase strongly with the preceding symptom duration of study subjects. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the neurodegenerative process in PD follows a negative exponential course and slows down with increasing symptom duration, contradicting the long-latency hypothesis of PD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.62.3.378

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Hilker, R., Schweitzer, K., Coburger, S., Ghaemi, M., Weisenbach, S., Jacobs, A. H., Rudolf, J., Herholz, K., & Heiss, W.-D.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
378
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135269664
Cited by
293
References
28
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Progression of Parkinson Disease as Determined by Serial Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging of Striatal Fluorodopa F 18 Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.62.3.378
The paper
Hilker, R., Schweitzer, K., Coburger, S., Ghaemi, M., Weisenbach, S., Jacobs, A. H., Rudolf, J., Herholz, K., & Heiss, W.-D. (2005). Nonlinear Progression of Parkinson Disease as Determined by Serial Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging of Striatal Fluorodopa F 18 Activity. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.3.378

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.