Cited by 737Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson disease

Doty, Richard L.·2012·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

Olfactory dysfunction is among the earliest nonmotor features of Parkinson disease (PD). Such dysfunction is present in approximately 90% of early-stage PD cases and can precede the onset of motor symptoms by years. The mechanisms responsible for olfactory dysfunction are currently unknown. As equivalent deficits are observed in Alzheimer disease, Down syndrome, and the Parkinson-dementia complex of Guam, a common pathological substrate may be involved. Given that olfactory loss occurs to a lesser extent or is absent in disorders such as multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy, olfactory testing can be useful in differential diagnosis. The olfactory dysfunction in PD and a number of related diseases with smell loss correlates with decreased numbers of neurons in structures such as the locus coeruleus, the raphe nuclei, and the nucleus basalis of Meynart. These neuroanatomical findings, together with evidence for involvement of the autonomic nervous system in numerous PD-related symptoms, suggest that deficits in cholinergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic function may contribute to the olfactory loss. This Review discusses the current understanding of olfactory dysfunction in PD, including factors that may be related to its cause.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.80

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doty, R. L.
Affiliations
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Doty, Richard L.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
329-339
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2110457518
Cited by
737
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
olfactory dysfunction, Parkinson's disease, anosmia, non-motor symptoms, prodromal Parkinson's disease, environmental exposure, Alzheimer's disease, Down syndrome, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, differential diagnosis, locus coeruleus, raphe nuclei, cholinergic dysfunction, noradrenergic dysfunction, serotonergic dysfunction, autonomic nervous system
MeSH terms
Olfaction Disorders, Humans, Parkinson Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review