Cited by 236Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Patient's Rating of Cognitive Ability: Using the AD8, a Brief Informant Interview, as a Self-rating Tool to Detect Dementia

Galvin, James E., Roe, Catherine M., Coats, Mary A., Morris, John C.·2007·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of patients to rate their own cognitive ability using the AD8 compared with informant and clinician ratings of cognitive status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The AD8 was administered to 325 consecutive participant-informant dyads enrolled in a longitudinal study at Washington University School of Medicine between April 4, 2005, and December 15, 2005. The number of AD8 items endorsed by the participant was compared with informant answers and an independently derived Clinical Dementia Rating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Strength of association was measured with Spearman (rho) and intraclass correlation coefficients. Receiver operator characteristic curves assessed the discriminative properties of the AD8. RESULTS: The mean age of participants and informants was 72.8 years (range, 43-104 years) and 66.4 years (range, 24-101 years), respectively. The Clinical Dementia Rating was correlated with both informant (rho = 0.75, P<.001) and participant (rho = 0.34, P<.001) AD8 scores. Participants' AD8 scores had adequate agreement with informants' AD8 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.62) and correlated with subjective complaints of memory problems (rho = 0.47, P<.001) but not with estimates of symptom duration. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the informant AD8 was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.93); for the participant AD8, it was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The AD8 is a brief measure that, when completed by an informant, differentiates nondemented from demented individuals. We now demonstrate that a self-completed AD8 also differentiates nondemented from demented individuals, although the utility was better in mildly impaired individuals compared with more demented individuals. In the absence of a reliable informant, the AD8 may be asked of the participant to gain an understanding of their perception of cognitive status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.64.5.725

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galvin, J. E., Roe, C. M., Coats, M. A., & Morris, J. C.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
725
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169661995
Cited by
236
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K08 AG20764, K08AG020764, P 50 AG05681, P50AG005681, P01 AG0 3991, P01AG003991)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
AD8, cognitive impairment, dementia screening, informant ratings, Clinical Dementia Rating, subjective memory complaints, mild cognitive impairment, discriminative validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Dementia, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Retrospective Studies, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review