Patient's Rating of Cognitive Ability: Using the AD8, a Brief Informant Interview, as a Self-rating Tool to Detect Dementia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of patients to rate their own cognitive ability using the AD8 compared with informant and clinician ratings of cognitive status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The AD8 was administered to 325 consecutive participant-informant dyads enrolled in a longitudinal study at Washington University School of Medicine between April 4, 2005, and December 15, 2005. The number of AD8 items endorsed by the participant was compared with informant answers and an independently derived Clinical Dementia Rating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Strength of association was measured with Spearman (rho) and intraclass correlation coefficients. Receiver operator characteristic curves assessed the discriminative properties of the AD8. RESULTS: The mean age of participants and informants was 72.8 years (range, 43-104 years) and 66.4 years (range, 24-101 years), respectively. The Clinical Dementia Rating was correlated with both informant (rho = 0.75, P<.001) and participant (rho = 0.34, P<.001) AD8 scores. Participants' AD8 scores had adequate agreement with informants' AD8 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.62) and correlated with subjective complaints of memory problems (rho = 0.47, P<.001) but not with estimates of symptom duration. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the informant AD8 was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.93); for the participant AD8, it was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The AD8 is a brief measure that, when completed by an informant, differentiates nondemented from demented individuals. We now demonstrate that a self-completed AD8 also differentiates nondemented from demented individuals, although the utility was better in mildly impaired individuals compared with more demented individuals. In the absence of a reliable informant, the AD8 may be asked of the participant to gain an understanding of their perception of cognitive status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three validated questionnaires were implemented to assess the older adult's frailty status covering multiple health domains.
“Three validated questionnaires were implemented to assess the older adult’s frailty status covering multiple health domains.”
From Embodied Conversational Agent Appearance for Health Assessment of Older Adults: Explorative Study (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Third report of the DLB consortium
McKeith, I. G., Dickson, D. W., Lowe, J., Emre, M., O'Brien, J. T., Feldman, H., Cummings, J., Duda, J. E., Lippa, C., Perry, E. K., et al. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1 · Cited by 5,069 · see citing works
Classification and Description of Frontotemporal Dementias
NEARY, D., SNOWDEN, J. S., & MANN, D. M. A. (2000) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06904.x · Cited by 99 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When appropriate, published criteria were used for other dementing disorders such as dementia with Lewy bodies(20) and frontotemporal dementia.(21) The CDR was used to determine the presence or absence of dementia and to stage its severity.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stubbs, B., Chen, L.-J., Chang, C.-Y., Sun, W.-J., & Ku, P.-W. (2017) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2017.03.003 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Embodied Conversational Agent Appearance for Health Assessment of Older Adults: Explorative Study
ter Stal, S., Broekhuis, M., van Velsen, L., Hermens, H., & Tabak, M. (2020) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/19987 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“The Alzheimer Disease Detection [22] tests for functional decline in memory using 8 yes or no items.”
MethodStressors and Acceptability of Services Among Black Caregivers of Persons With Memory Problems
Ejem, D., Atkins, G. C., Perkins, M., Morhardt, D. J., Williams, I. C., Cothran, F. A., Epps, F., Scott, C., Mittelman, M., & Clay, O. J. (2022) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20220505-01 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Galvin, J. E., Roe, C. M., Coats, M. A., & Morris, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 725
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169661995
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K08 AG20764, K08AG020764, P 50 AG05681, P50AG005681, P01 AG0 3991, P01AG003991)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- AD8, cognitive impairment, dementia screening, informant ratings, Clinical Dementia Rating, subjective memory complaints, mild cognitive impairment, discriminative validity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Dementia, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Retrospective Studies, Confidence Intervals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review