Cited by 99Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Classification and Description of Frontotemporal Dementias

NEARY, D., SNOWDEN, J. S., MANN, D. M.A.·2000·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: A number of distinct clinical syndromes have been described that are associated with focal degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes and have a non‐Alzheimer pathology. The nosological status of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) has been a matter of controversy, in view of the diversity of clinical manifestations and distribution and nature of histopathological change. This paper describes the major clinical syndromes of frontotemporal dementia, progressive aphasia, and semantic dementia; it discusses their underlying pathologies and considers their molecular status. Common histopathological changes are demonstrated across the three clinical syndromes, highlighting the link between these clinical disorders. It has been suggested that these disorders should be regarded as tauopathies on the basis of the tau pathology seen in a number of cases and the mutations in the tau gene in some familial cases. However, in a series of 47 consecutive autopsy series of FTLD, only 36% had tau pathology and 10% mutations in the tau gene, suggesting that FTLD does not constitute a unitary etiological disorder and that its characterization as a tauopathy may be potentially misleading.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06904.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical distinction between fvAD and bvFTD has implications for prognosis, treatment, disease progression, and caregiver burden.

    “The appropriate clinical distinction between fvAD and bvFTD has implications for prognosis, treatment, disease progression, and caregiver burden [11–15].”
  • bvFTD presentation is characterized by changes in personality and behavior, most notably apathy, disinhibition, loss of self-awareness, and loss of empathy.

    “Typically, the presentation is characterized by changes in personality and behavior, most notably apathy, disinhibition, loss of self-awareness, and loss of empathy [11, 18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NEARY, D., SNOWDEN, J. S., & MANN, D. M. A.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
NEARY, D.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
920
Issue
1
Pages
46-51
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2000757231
Cited by
99
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
frontotemporal dementia, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, progressive aphasia, semantic dementia, tauopathy, tau gene mutations, disease classification, histopathology, molecular genetics, non-Alzheimer's dementia
MeSH terms
Aged, Aphasia, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Temporal Lobe, Motor Neuron Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review