Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica With Mycophenolate Mofetil: Retrospective Analysis of 24 Patients

Open access
Jacob, Anu, Matiello, Marcelo, Weinshenker, Brian G., Wingerchuk, Dean M., Lucchinetti, Claudia, Shuster, Elizabeth, Carter, Jonathan, Keegan, B. Mark, Kantarci, Orhun H., Pittock, Sean J.·2009·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is the first inflammatory autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system for which a specific antigenic target has been identified; the marker autoantibody NMO-IgG specifically recognizes the astrocytic water channel aquaporin 4. Current evidence strongly suggests that NMO-IgG may be pathogenic. Since disability accrues incrementally related to attacks, attack prevention with immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay of preventing disability. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in NMO spectrum disorders. DESIGN: Retrospective case series with prospective telephone follow-up. SETTING: Mayo Clinic Health System. Patients Twenty-four patients with NMO spectrum disorders (7 treatment-naive). Intervention Mycophenolate mofetil (median dose of 2000 mg per day). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annualized relapse rates and disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 18-89 months), 19 patients (79%) were continuing treatment. The median duration of treatment was 27 months (range, 1-89 months). The median annualized posttreatment relapse rate was lower than the pretreatment rate (0.09; range, 0-1.5; and 1.3; range, 0.23-11.8, respectively; P < .001). Disability stabilized or decreased in 22 of 24 patients (91%). One patient died of disease complications during follow-up. Six patients (25%) noted adverse effects during treatment with mycophenolate. CONCLUSION: Mycophenolate is associated with reduction in relapse frequency and stable or reduced disability in patients with NMO spectrum disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneurol.2009.175

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Jacob, A., Matiello, M., Weinshenker, B. G., Wingerchuk, D. M., Lucchinetti, C., Shuster, E., Carter, J., Keegan, B. M., Kantarci, O. H., & Pittock, S. J.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
1128-33
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023686387
Cited by
308
References
0
FWCI
17.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica With Mycophenolate Mofetil: Retrospective Analysis of 24 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneurol.2009.175
The paper
Jacob, A., Matiello, M., Weinshenker, B. G., Wingerchuk, D. M., Lucchinetti, C., Shuster, E., Carter, J., Keegan, B. M., Kantarci, O. H., & Pittock, S. J. (2009). Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica With Mycophenolate Mofetil: Retrospective Analysis of 24 Patients. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.