The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica With Mycophenolate Mofetil: Retrospective Analysis of 24 Patients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is the first inflammatory autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system for which a specific antigenic target has been identified; the marker autoantibody NMO-IgG specifically recognizes the astrocytic water channel aquaporin 4. Current evidence strongly suggests that NMO-IgG may be pathogenic. Since disability accrues incrementally related to attacks, attack prevention with immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay of preventing disability. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in NMO spectrum disorders. DESIGN: Retrospective case series with prospective telephone follow-up. SETTING: Mayo Clinic Health System. Patients Twenty-four patients with NMO spectrum disorders (7 treatment-naive). Intervention Mycophenolate mofetil (median dose of 2000 mg per day). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annualized relapse rates and disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 18-89 months), 19 patients (79%) were continuing treatment. The median duration of treatment was 27 months (range, 1-89 months). The median annualized posttreatment relapse rate was lower than the pretreatment rate (0.09; range, 0-1.5; and 1.3; range, 0.23-11.8, respectively; P < .001). Disability stabilized or decreased in 22 of 24 patients (91%). One patient died of disease complications during follow-up. Six patients (25%) noted adverse effects during treatment with mycophenolate. CONCLUSION: Mycophenolate is associated with reduction in relapse frequency and stable or reduced disability in patients with NMO spectrum disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS), Trebst, C., Jarius, S., Berthele, A., Paul, F., Schippling, S., Wildemann, B., Borisow, N., Kleiter, I., Aktas, O., et al. (2014) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7 · Cited by 595
Jarius, S., Paul, F., Weinshenker, B. G., Levy, M., Kim, H. J., & Wildemann, B. (2020) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0214-9 · Cited by 478
Self-citationEFNS guidelines on diagnosis and management of neuromyelitis optica
Sellner, J., Boggild, M., Clanet, M., Hintzen, R. Q., Illes, Z., Montalban, X., Du Pasquier, R. A., Polman, C. H., Sorensen, P. S., & Hemmer, B. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03066.x · Cited by 461
Pittock, S. J., Lennon, V. A., McKeon, A., Mandrekar, J., Weinshenker, B. G., Lucchinetti, C. F., O'Toole, O., & Wingerchuk, D. M. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70076-0 · Cited by 395
Self-citationMealy, M. A., Wingerchuk, D. M., Palace, J., Greenberg, B. M., & Levy, M. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5699 · Cited by 302
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacob, A., Matiello, M., Weinshenker, B. G., Wingerchuk, D. M., Lucchinetti, C., Shuster, E., Carter, J., Keegan, B. M., Kantarci, O. H., & Pittock, S. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1128-33
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023686387
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica With Mycophenolate Mofetil: Retrospective Analysis of 24 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneurol.2009.175
- The paper
- Jacob, A., Matiello, M., Weinshenker, B. G., Wingerchuk, D. M., Lucchinetti, C., Shuster, E., Carter, J., Keegan, B. M., Kantarci, O. H., & Pittock, S. J. (2009). Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica With Mycophenolate Mofetil: Retrospective Analysis of 24 Patients. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.