The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pittsburgh Compound B Imaging and Prediction of Progression From Cognitive Normality to Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD), as detected by the amyloid-imaging agent Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) in cognitively normal older adults, is associated with risk of symptomatic AD. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study of cognitively normal older adults assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) to determine the mean cortical binding potential for PiB and followed up with annual clinical and cognitive assessments for progression to very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). SETTING: The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-nine participants with a mean age of 71.5 years with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0 on a PET PiB scan at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Progression from CDR 0 to CDR 0.5 status (very mild dementia). RESULTS: Twenty-three participants progressed to CDR 0.5 at follow-up assessment (range, 1-5 assessments after PET PiB). Of these, 9 also were diagnosed with DAT. Higher mean cortical binding potential values for PiB (hazard ratio, 4.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-19.01; P = .02) and age (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.28; P = .03) predicted progression to CDR 0.5 DAT. The CDR 0.5 DAT group showed decline in 3 cognitive domains (episodic memory, semantic memory, and visuospatial performance) and had volume loss in the parahippocampal gyrus (includes entorhinal cortex) compared with individuals who remained at CDR 0. CONCLUSION: Preclinical AD as detected by PET PiB is not benign, as it is associated with progression to symptomatic AD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Studies of non-demented elderly cohorts overall report approximately 20–40% are PIB-positive [67, 68, 71–78].”
From Brain aging, Alzheimer's disease, and mitochondria (2011) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882
Self-citationTalairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.
Wechsler, D. (1955) · Psychological Corp. eBooks · Cited by 4,941
Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B
Klunk, W. E., Engler, H., Nordberg, A., Wang, Y., Blomqvist, G., Holt, D. P., Bergström, M., Savitcheva, I., Huang, G., Estrada, S., et al. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20009 · Cited by 4,496
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects
Shaw, L. M., Vanderstichele, H., Knapik‐Czajka, M., Clark, C. M., Aisen, P. S., Petersen, R. C., Blennow, K., Soares, H., Simon, A., Lewczuk, P., et al. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21610 · Cited by 2,065
Mild Cognitive Impairment Represents Early-Stage Alzheimer Disease
Morris, J. C., Storandt, M., Miller, J. P., McKeel, D. W., Price, J. L., Rubin, E. H., & Berg, L. (2001) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.58.3.397 · Cited by 1,871
Self-citationHansson, O., Zetterberg, H., Buchhave, P., Londos, E., Blennow, K., & Minthon, L. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70355-6 · Cited by 1,700
Distribution Volume Ratios without Blood Sampling from Graphical Analysis of PET Data
Logan, J., Fowler, J. S., Volkow, N. D., Wang, G., Ding, Y., & Alexoff, D. L. (1996) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-199609000-00008 · Cited by 1,515
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sperling, R. A., Aisen, P. S., Beckett, L. A., Bennett, D. A., Craft, S., Fagan, A. M., Iwatsubo, T., Jack, C. R., Kaye, J., Montine, T. J., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003 · Cited by 7,155
Self-citationAdvancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria
Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., Hampel, H., Molinuevo, J. L., Blennow, K., DeKosky, S. T., Gauthier, S., Selkoe, D., Bateman, R., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70090-0 · Cited by 3,321
Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies
Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001 · Cited by 3,204
Self-citationRevising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon
Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., Cummings, J. L., DeKosky, S. T., Barberger-Gateau, P., Delacourte, A., Frisoni, G., Fox, N. C., Galasko, D., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70223-4 · Cited by 1,869
Masters, C. L., Bateman, R., Blennow, K., Rowe, C. C., Sperling, R. A., & Cummings, J. L. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.56 · Cited by 1,853
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, J. C., Roe, C. M., Grant, E. A., Head, D., Storandt, M., Goate, A. M., Fagan, A. M., Holtzman, D. M., & Mintun, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1469-75
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2798814
- OpenAlex
- W2031489026
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 35.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448)
- National Institute on Aging (P 50 AG05681, P50AG005681, P01 AG0 3991, P01AG003991, P01AG026276)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024992)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- preclinical Alzheimer's disease, Pittsburgh compound B, amyloid PET, conversion to dementia, very mild dementia, cognitively normal older adults, Clinical Dementia Rating, episodic memory decline, visuospatial performance, entorhinal cortex, risk prediction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Carbon Radioisotopes, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Thiazoles, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
