The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Risk of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: Population-Based Familial Aggregation Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To study familial aggregation of primary open-angle glaucoma in a general population and to determine the absolute and relative risks for first-degree relatives. METHODS: First-degree relatives of patients with glaucoma (n = 48) and control subjects (n = 155) from the population-based Rotterdam Study underwent a standardized examination, including perimetry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure, vertical cup-disc ratio; and the presence of glaucoma, defined as a visual field defect with a cup-disc ratio of 0.7 or higher or asymmetry of 0.3 or higher between both eyes. RESULTS: The prevalence of glaucoma was 10.4% in siblings of patients, 1.1% in offspring of patients, 0.7% in siblings of controls, and 0% in offspring of controls. Life-time risk of elevated intraocular pressure in relatives of patients vs relatives of controls was 42.5% vs 6.7%, of enlarged cup-disc ratio was 62.2% vs 16.6%, and of glaucoma was 22.0% vs 2.3%, yielding a risk ratio for glaucoma of 9.2 (95% confidence interval = 1.2-73.9). The population-attributable risk of glaucoma was 16.4%. CONCLUSIONS: In a general population, relatives of patients with glaucoma have a strongly increased risk of glaucoma. Enlarged cup-disc ratio, not intraocular pressure, was the earliest and most prominent feature of familial aggregation. Further studies are needed to disentangle the genetic components of the increased familial risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROPORTION OF DISEASE CAUSED OR PREVENTED BY A GIVEN EXPOSURE, TRAIT OR INTERVENTION1
MIETTINEN, O. S. (1974) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121617 · Cited by 1,036 · cited 2×
“The attributable proportion of genetic factors to the occurrence of glaucoma in the exposed and the general population was estimated using the formulas developed by Miettinen.29 The attributable proportion for the genetically exposed (Ape) was calculated with the formula Ape = (RR − 1) / RR, where RR is the relative r…”
Method
Cited by
Quigley, H. A. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61423-7 · Cited by 1,121
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
Risk Factors for Open-Angle Glaucoma in a Japanese PopulationThe Tajimi Study
SUZUKI, Y., IWASE, A., ARAIE, M., YAMAMOTO, T., ABE, H., SHIRATO, S., KUWAYAMA, Y., MISHIMA, H., SHIMIZU, H., & TOMITA, G. (2006) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.059 · Cited by 398
Surveillance for ocular hypertension: an evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.
Burr, J., Botello-Pinzon, P., Takwoingi, Y., Hernández, R., Vazquez-Montes, M., Elders, A., Asaoka, R., Banister, K., van der Schoot, J., Fraser, C., et al. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16290 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfs, R. C. W.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1640
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060819029
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Risk of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: Population-Based Familial Aggregation Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.116.12.1640
- The paper
- Wolfs, R. C. W. (1998). Genetic Risk of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: Population-Based Familial Aggregation Study. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.12.1640
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.