Cited by 1,036Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyHistorical and modern epidemiology studiesAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

PROPORTION OF DISEASE CAUSED OR PREVENTED BY A GIVEN EXPOSURE, TRAIT OR INTERVENTION1

MIETTINEN, OLLI S.·1974·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The structures of two epidemiologic parameters are explored. One, the “etiologic fraction, ” relates to markers of increased risk, and it is the proportion of disease attributable to the marker and/or to factors associated with it. The other, the “prevented fraction, ” is the equivalent of this for a marker of reduced risk. It is shown that both parameters depend—in different ways—-on the frequency of the marker among cases of the disease, and on the “standardized morbidity ratio” for those with the marker. Point estimation of these parameters is often straight-forward, particularly in case-control studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121617

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ETT has been used in econometrics to evaluate the effectiveness of social programs on their participants and has long been the target of research in epidemiology, where it came to be known as 'the effect of exposure on the exposed,' or 'standardized morbidity'.

    “ETT has been used in econometrics to evaluate the effectiveness of social programs on their participants (Heckman, 1992) and has long been the target of research in epidemiology, where it came to be known as 'the effect of exposure on the exposed,' or 'standardized morbidity' (Miettinen, 1974; Greenland and Robins, 1986).”

    From Causal inference in statistics: An overview (2009) · cites this paper as Miettinen, 1974

  • Population-attributable fractions were calculated using Miettinen's formula, adjusted prevalence ratios, and weighted prevalence estimates of each health condition and risk behavior by each cumulative ACEs count level.

    “Population-attributable fractions, adjusted for aforementioned model covariates, were calculated using Miettinen’s formula, aPRs, and weighted prevalence estimates of each health condition and risk behavior by each cumulative ACEs count level”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MIETTINEN, O. S.
Corresponding author
MIETTINEN, OLLI S.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1974-05
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
325-332
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1953501928
Cited by
1,036
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
population attributable fraction, prevented fraction, attributable fraction, risk indicators, standardized morbidity ratio, case-control study, disease prevention
MeSH terms
Coffee, Coronary Disease, Drinking, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Models, Theoretical, Morbidity, Myocardial Infarction, Population, Preventive Medicine, Smoking, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review