The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence of Glaucoma in Chinese Residents of Singapore<subtitle>A Cross-Sectional Population Survey of the Tanjong Pagar District</subtitle>
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on prevalence of glaucoma in East Asia are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese Singaporeans. METHODS: A group of 2000 Chinese people, aged 40 to 79 years, were selected from the electoral register of Tanjong Pagar district in Singapore using a disproportionate, stratified, clustered, random-sampling procedure. Glaucoma was diagnosed in people with an excavated optic neuropathy and a reproducible visual field defect or on the basis of severe structural disc abnormality alone, if reliable field results could not be obtained. The diagnosis was also made in blind subjects with raised intraocular pressure or previous glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: Of 1717 eligible subjects, 1232 were examined, with a response rate of 71.8%. There were 45 cases of glaucoma: 27 were men and 18 were women. The main diagnoses were primary open-angle glaucoma (n = 22 [49%]), primary angle-closure glaucoma (n = 14 [31%]), and secondary glaucoma (n = 7 [16%]). It was not possible to determine the mechanism in 2 (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The age-standardized prevalence of glaucoma was 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.1) in the population 40 years and older. Glaucoma was the leading cause of blindness. Primary angle-closure glaucoma and secondary glaucoma were the most visually destructive forms of the disease. Our findings suggest current projections of glaucoma prevalence among ethnic Chinese are a substantial underestimate. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1105-1111
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
Foster, P. J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 · Cited by 2,365
Self-citationQuigley, H. A. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61423-7 · Cited by 1,121
Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos
Varma, R., Ying-Lai, M., Francis, B. A., Nguyen, B. B.-T., Deneen, J., Wilson, M. R., & Azen, S. P. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.025 · Cited by 483
Foong, A. W. P., Saw, S.-M., Loo, J.-L., Shen, S., Loon, S.-C., Rosman, M., Aung, T., Tan, D. T. H., Tai, E. S., & Wong, T. Y. (2007) · Ophthalmic Epidemiology · doi:10.1080/09286580600878844 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, P. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1105
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118794838
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence of Glaucoma in Chinese Residents of Singapore<subtitle>A Cross-Sectional Population Survey of the Tanjong Pagar District</subtitle>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.118.8.1105
- The paper
- Foster, P. J. (2000). The Prevalence of Glaucoma in Chinese Residents of Singapore<subtitle>A Cross-Sectional Population Survey of the Tanjong Pagar District</subtitle>. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.8.1105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.