Dietary fat and risk for advanced age-related macular degeneration
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between intake of total and specific types of fat and risk for advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of irreversible blindness in adults. DESIGN: A multicenter eye disease case-control study. SETTING: Five US clinical ophthalmology centers. PATIENTS: Case subjects included 349 individuals (age range, 55-80 years) with the advanced, neovascular stage of AMD diagnosed within 1 year of their enrollment into the study who resided near a participating clinical center. Control subjects included 504 individuals without AMD but with other ocular diseases. Controls were from the same geographic areas as cases and were frequency-matched to cases by age and sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk for AMD according to level of fat intake, controlling for cigarette smoking and other risk factors. RESULTS: Higher vegetable fat consumption was associated with an elevated risk for AMD. After adjusting for age, sex, education, cigarette smoking, and other risk factors, the odds ratio (OR) was 2.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-3.74) for persons in the highest vs those in the lowest quintiles of intake (P for trend,.007). The risk for AMD was also significantly elevated for the highest vs lowest quintiles of intake of monounsaturated (OR, 1.71) and polyunsaturated (OR, 1.86) fats (Ps for trend,.03 and.03, respectively). Higher consumption of linoleic acid was also associated with a higher risk for AMD (P for trend,.02). Higher intake of omega-3 fatty acids was associated with a lower risk for AMD among individuals consuming diets low in linoleic acid, an omega-6 fatty acid (P for trend,.05; P for continuous variable,.03). Similarly, higher frequency of fish intake tended to reduce risk for AMD when the diet was low in linoleic acid (P for trend,.05). Conversely, neither omega-3 fatty acids nor fish intake were related to risk for AMD among people with high levels of linoleic acid intake. CONCLUSION: Higher intake of specific types of fat--including vegetable, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats and linoleic acid--rather than total fat intake may be associated with a greater risk for advanced AMD. Diets high in omega-3 fatty acids and fish were inversely associated with risk for AMD when intake of linoleic acid was low.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific types of fats might be differentially associated with the risk for age-related macular degeneration.
“Specific types of fats might be differentially associated with the risk for age-related macular degeneration.86”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [86]
Some case-control studies have found evidence of decreasing risk of neovascular age-related macular degeneration among individuals reporting the highest intake of omega-3 fatty acids and fish, especially if in conjunction with lower levels of intake of linoleic acid.
“Some case–control studies have found evidence of decreasing risk of neovascular age-related macular degeneration among individuals reporting the highest intake of omega-3 fatty acids and fish,105,106 especially if in conjunction with lower levels of intake of linoleic acid.107”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [106]
Seddon et al. reported a trend for decreasing odds of neovascular AMD with increasing amounts of omega-3 and fresh-fish intake.
“Interestingly, Seddon et al. [32] reported a trend for decreasing odds of neovascular AMD with increasing amounts of omega-3 and fresh-fish intake.”
From CFH Y402H confers similar risk of soft drusen and both forms of advanced AMD (2005) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 408
- Authors
- Seddon, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
- Corresponding author
- Seddon, Johanna M.
- ORCID
- Seddon, Johanna M.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1191
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970385641
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 15.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03ey009972-01)
- National Eye Institute (EY09972, R01EY011309)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- age-related macular degeneration, dietary fat, vegetable fats, monounsaturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, linoleic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, fish consumption, neovascular AMD, dietary risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dietary Fats, Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated, Fatty Acids, Unsaturated, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, United States, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Diet Records, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Linoleic Acid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review