The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anatomical Outcomes of Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole as Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of anatomical closure of idiopathic macular holes undergoing vitreous surgery with respect to preoperative horizontal diameter as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to correlate postoperative visual acuity, duration of symptoms, and late reopening with initial idiopathic macular hole diameter by OCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients with an idiopathic macular hole were examined with OCT before and after vitreous surgery. All eyes were treated with pars plana vitrectomy, peeling of posterior cortical vitreous, and dilute perfluoropropane or sulfur hexafluoride gas. Face-down positioning was maintained for 7 to 14 days. RESULTS: Twenty-two (92%) of 24 eyes with a preoperative idiopathic macular hole diameter smaller than 400 microm measured by OCT attained anatomical closure following surgery. Anatomical closure was observed in 9 (56%) of 16 eyes with a macular hole diameter of 400 microm or larger measured by OCT (P =.02). The median postoperative visual acuity improvement was 4 Snellen lines in the 31 eyes achieving anatomical closure and no change in the 9 eyes not achieving anatomical closure (P< .001). Late macular hole reopening at longer than 6 months occurred in 3 (10%) of 31 eyes with an initially closed macular hole. This event was observed only in macular holes 400 microm or larger measured by OCT. The preoperative macular hole diameter (P =.02) and duration of symptoms (P =.02) were factors predictive of anatomical closure of the macular hole postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative closure of idiopathic macular holes following vitreous surgery was related to the preoperative macular hole diameter determined by OCT, with lesions smaller than 400 microm demonstrating higher success rates. A trend toward greater visual acuity improvement was demonstrated for idiopathic macular holes smaller than 400 microm. Late reopening was only seen in macular holes that were 400 microm or larger measured by OCT. Preoperative analysis and measurement of idiopathic macular holes with OCT may help delineate postoperative expectations for successful anatomical closure of the macular hole, visual acuity, and long-term closure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Duker, J. S., Kaiser, P. K., Binder, S., de Smet, M. D., Gaudric, A., Reichel, E., Sadda, S. R., Sebag, J., Spaide, R. F., & Stalmans, P. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.042 · Cited by 1,206
Complications of vitreoretinal surgery
Belin, P. J., & Parke, D. W. (2020) · Current Opinion in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/icu.0000000000000652 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Ip, M. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002282409
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomical Outcomes of Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole as Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.120.1.29
- The paper
- Ip, M. S. (2002). Anatomical Outcomes of Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole as Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.1.29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.