The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glaucoma in Zulus: A Population-Based Cross-sectional Survey in a Rural District in South Africa
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and the main types of glaucoma in a representative adult population in rural Zululand, and to describe the distribution of glaucoma-related variables in healthy subjects and those with glaucoma. DESIGN: A population-based, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Hlabisa district, Northern KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: Resident individuals of Zulu ethnic origin, 40 years or older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Glaucoma was diagnosed by means of strict objective criteria, based on binocular indirect ophthalmoscopic optic disc appearances validated by results of disc photography and threshold visual field testing. RESULTS: From an eligible sample of 1115 subjects, 1005 (90.1%) were examined in the survey. The adjusted prevalence of glaucoma of all types was 4.5%, and primary open-angle glaucoma accounted for 2.7%. Secondary glaucoma occurred with an adjusted prevalence of 1.7%, of which the principal contributors were exfoliative and aphakic glaucoma. The prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma was low. Normal tension (intraocular pressure, < or =21 mm Hg) was measured in 16 (57.1%) of 28 cases of primary open-angle glaucoma. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of bilateral blindness was 3.2%, which was exclusively due to glaucoma in 9 (22.0%) of 41 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary glaucoma constitute a significant public health problem in rural Zululand. The prevalence and types of glaucoma vary among different black populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese
Iwase, A., Suzuki, Y., Araie, M., Yamamoto, T., Abe, H., Shirato, S., Kuwayama, Y., Mishima, H. K., Shimizu, H., Tomita, G., et al. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029 · Cited by 872
Pascolini, D., Mariotti, S. P., Pokharel, G. P., Pararajasegaram, R., Etya’ale, D., Négrel, A.-D., & Resnikoff, S. (2004) · Ophthalmic Epidemiology · doi:10.1076/opep.11.2.67.28158 · Cited by 527
Rudnicka, A. R., Mt-Isa, S., Owen, C. G., Cook, D. G., & Ashby, D. (2006) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0299 · Cited by 502
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotchford, A. P.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 471
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025527168
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glaucoma in Zulus: A Population-Based Cross-sectional Survey in a Rural District in South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.120.4.471
- The paper
- Rotchford, A. P. (2002). Glaucoma in Zulus: A Population-Based Cross-sectional Survey in a Rural District in South Africa. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.4.471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.