The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variations in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Prevalence by Age, Gender, and Race: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify the variation in primary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) prevalence with age, gender, race, year of publication, and survey methodology. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for studies of OAG prevalence. Studies with defined population samplings were sought. Forty-six published observational studies of OAG prevalence (103,567 participants with 2509 cases of OAG) were identified for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Data on the number of people and the number of cases of OAG by age, race, and gender were sought for each study. Additional information was obtained regarding whether the definition of glaucoma relied on raised intraocular pressure (IOP) and whether visual field examination was performed routinely on all individuals. Bayesian meta-analysis was used to model the associations between the log odds of OAG and age, race, gender, year of publication, method of visual field testing, and effect of reliance on IOP in the definition of OAG. RESULTS: Black populations had the highest OAG prevalence at all ages, but the proportional increase in prevalence of OAG with age was highest in white populations. The odds ratio per decade increase in age was 2.05 in white populations (95% credible interval, 1.91 to 2.18), 1.61 (95% credible interval, 1.53 to 1.70) in black populations, and 1.57 (95% credible interval, 1.46 to 1.68) in Asian populations. The average estimated prevalence in those older than 70 years of age was 6% in white populations, 16% in black populations, and 3% in Asian populations. After adjusting for age, race, year of publication, and survey methods, men were 1.37 (95% credible interval, 1.22 to 1.53) times more likely than women to have OAG. The prevalence of OAG was one third lower in studies in which routine visual fields were not assessed and that used an IOP criterion in the definition of glaucoma; this effect was reduced to the null after adjustment for age, racial group, and year of publication. CONCLUSIONS: Although black populations had the highest prevalence of OAG at all ages, white populations showed the steepest increase in OAG prevalence with age. Men were more likely than women to have OAG.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.
Quigley, H. A. (1996) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389 · Cited by 2,998
Leibowitz, H. M., Krueger, D. E., Maunder, L. R., Milton, R. C., KINI, M. M., Kahn, H. A., Nickerson, R. J., Pool, J., Colton, T., Ganley, J. P., et al. (1980) · PubMed · Cited by 1,250
Prevalence of Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Adults in the United States
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.532 · Cited by 1,110
Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Sponsel, W. E., Franke, T., Cantor, L. B., Martone, J., & Menage, M. J. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31774-9 · Cited by 967
Prevalence of Open-angle Glaucoma in Australia
Mitchell, P., Smith, W., Attebo, K., & Healey, P. R. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30449-1 · Cited by 959
Racial Variations in the Prevalence of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey
Tielsch, J. M. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470030069026 · Cited by 879
The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese
Iwase, A., Suzuki, Y., Araie, M., Yamamoto, T., Abe, H., Shirato, S., Kuwayama, Y., Mishima, H. K., Shimizu, H., Tomita, G., et al. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029 · Cited by 872
The Barbados Eye Study: Prevalence of Open Angle Glaucoma
Leske, M. C. (1994) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1994.01090180121046 · Cited by 685
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
Jonas, J. B., Aung, T., Bourne, R. R., Bron, A. M., Ritch, R., & Panda-Jonas, S. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31469-1 · Cited by 1,322
Kapetanakis, V. V., Chan, M. P. Y., Foster, P. J., Cook, D. G., Owen, C. G., & Rudnicka, A. R. (2016) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223 · Cited by 522
Self-citationMicroglia in Retinal Degeneration
Rashid, K., Akhtar-Schaefer, I., & Langmann, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01975 · Cited by 355
Age-related eye disease and gender
Zetterberg, M. (2016) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.10.005 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudnicka, A. R., Mt-Isa, S., Owen, C. G., Cook, D. G., & Ashby, D.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4254
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2003959496
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variations in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Prevalence by Age, Gender, and Race: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.06-0299
- The paper
- Rudnicka, A. R., Mt-Isa, S., Owen, C. G., Cook, D. G., & Ashby, D. (2006). Variations in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Prevalence by Age, Gender, and Race: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.