Cited by 106Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

The Prevalence of Age-Related Maculopathy in Iceland: Reykjavik Eye Study

Jonasson, Fridbert·2003·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective: To examine the age-and sex-specific prevalence of age-related maculopathy (ARM) and agerelated macular degeneration (AMD) in citizens of Reykjavik, Iceland, who were 50 years and older.Design: Random sample, cross sectional. Materials and Methods:Response rate was 75.8%.The presence and severity of various characteristics of drusen and pigmentary changes that are typical of ARM and AMD were determined by grading stereoscopic color fundus photographs, using the international classification and grading system for ARM and AMD.Results: We were able to evaluate 1021 right-eye and 1020 left-eye macular photographs.There was no statistically significant difference between right and left eyes.In people aged 50 to 59 years, 4.8% of participants (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-7.0)were found to have intermediate soft drusen measuring 63 to 125 µm in either eye; 1.2% (95% CI, 0.0-2.3)had large soft distinct drusen larger than 125 µm; and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.0-1.4) had large soft, crystalline, or semisolid drusen.The same figures for those 80 years and older were 18.2% (95% CI, 9.8-26.6),10.9% (95% CI, 4.0-17.8),and 25.5% (95% CI, 18.4-32.6),respectively.Geographic atrophy was found in either eye in 9.2% of those participants 70 years and older (95% CI, 5.6-12.7),and exudative macular degeneration was found in 2.3% of participants 70 years and older (95% CI, 0.5-4.1). Conclusion:Geographic atrophy was found to be more common in our study than in other population-based studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.121.3.379

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Icelandic population, GA outnumbers neovascular AMD by three to one.

    “In the Icelandic population under consideration here, however, GA was found to outnumber neovascular AMD by three to one, as reported in the Reykjavik Eye Study [28,29].”
  • Consumption of fresh fish and fishliver oil with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids among Icelanders is among the highest in the world.

    “Consumption of fresh fish and fishliver oil with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids among Icelanders is among the highest in the world [28].”
  • The 5-year incidence of soft drusen in the Reykjavik Eye Study was similar to that of the Beaver Dam Eye Study and the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

    “The 5-y incidence of soft drusen in the Reykjavik Eye Study, a population-based epidemiological study of individuals aged 50 y and older [28,29], was found to be similar to that of the Beaver Dam Eye Study in the US [30], and the Blue Mountains Eye Study in Australia [31].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 106

Authors
Jonasson, F.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
379
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057579740
Cited by
106
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
age-related maculopathy, age-related macular degeneration, drusen, geographic atrophy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, prevalence, age and sex differences, Reykjavík

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review