The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of Metastatic Disease After Enrollment in the COMS Trials for Treatment of Choroidal Melanoma: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group Report No. 26
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the time between treatment for choroidal melanoma and first diagnosis of metastatic disease, sites of metastasis, treatments for metastasis, and time between diagnosis of metastasis and death. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal follow-up of patients diagnosed with choroidal melanoma who were enrolled in 2 randomized trials conducted by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. METHODS: Systemic and laboratory evaluations were performed during follow-up according to a standard protocol for 2320 patients enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study trials without evidence of melanoma metastasis or other primary cancer at baseline. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-nine patients were diagnosed with at least 1 site of metastasis during follow-up after treatment for choroidal melanoma. Five- and 10-year cumulative metastasis rates were 25% (95% confidence interval, 23%-27%) and 34% (95% confidence interval, 32%-37%), respectively. Liver was the most common site (89%). The death rate following the report of melanoma metastasis was 80% at 1 year (95% confidence interval, 77%-83%) and 92% at 2 years (95% confidence interval, 89%-94%). Overall survival after metastasis did not vary by baseline size of primary tumor nor treatment for metastasis (when known). Long-term survival after diagnosis of metastasis was uncommon; only 8 patients survived 5 or more years. CONCLUSION: Metastasis rate increased significantly with increasing primary tumor dimensions at time of patient enrollment. Prognosis after metastatic disease remains poor. Effective methods are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat metastasis from choroidal melanoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Very Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Malignant Uveal Melanoma
Kujala, E., Ma¨kitie, T., & Kivela¨, T. (2003) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0538 · Cited by 1,045
Survival of Patents with Metastases from Uveal Melanoma
Gragoudas, E. S., Egan, K. M., Seddon, J. M., Glynn, R. J., Walsh, S. M., Finn, S. M., Munzenrider, J. E., & Spar, M. D. (1991) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32285-1 · Cited by 368
A prognostic model and staging for metastatic uveal melanoma
Eskelin, S., Pyrhönen, S. O., Hahka‐Kemppinen, M., Tuomaala, S., & Kivelä, T. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11113 · Cited by 166
Treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: Review and recommendations
Albert, D. M., Niffenegger, A. S., & Willson, J. K. V. (1992) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(05)80024-4 · Cited by 117
Diener‐West, M., Earle, J. D., Fine, S., Hawkins, B. S., Moy, C. S., Reynolds, S. M., SCHACHAT, A. P., & Straatsma, B. R. (2001) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.119.7.951 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Effectiveness of Treatments for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Augsburger, J. J., Corrêa, Z. M., & Shaikh, A. H. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.023 · Cited by 288
Zimmer, L., Vaubel, J., Mohr, P., Hauschild, A., Utikal, J., Simon, J., Garbe, C., Herbst, R., Enk, A., Kämpgen, E., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118564 · Cited by 269
The PEMDAC phase 2 study of pembrolizumab and entinostat in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma
Ny, L., Jespersen, H., Karlsson, J., Alsén, S., Filges, S., All-Eriksson, C., Andersson, B., Carneiro, A., Helgadottir, H., Levin, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25332-w · Cited by 177
Low thyroid hormone levels improve survival in murine model for ocular melanoma
Fabian, I. D., Rosner, M., Fabian, I., Vishnevskia-Dai, V., Zloto, O., Maman, E. S., Cohen, K., Ellis, M., Lin, H.-Y., Hercbergs, A., et al. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.3566 · Cited by 36
BRAF V600E-dependent role of autophagy in uveal melanoma
Zhao, Y., Wang, W., Min, I., Wyrwas, B., Moore, M., Zarnegar, R., & Fahey, T. J. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-016-2317-y · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1639
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W65135050
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Metastatic Disease After Enrollment in the COMS Trials for Treatment of Choroidal Melanoma: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group Report No. 26. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.123.12.1639
- The paper
- Development of Metastatic Disease After Enrollment in the COMS Trials for Treatment of Choroidal Melanoma: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group Report No. 26. (2005). Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.12.1639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.