Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Healthy Subjects as Measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry
Abstract
Objectives To test whether dynamic contour tonometry yields ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements that are independent of corneal thickness and curvature, and to assess variables of observer agreement. Methods In a multivariate cluster analysis on 223 eyes, the relationship between central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, axial length, anterior chamber depth, intraocular pressure, sex, age, and OPA measurements was assessed. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were calculated from repeated measurements obtained from 8 volunteers by 4 observers. Results The OPA readings were not affected by central corneal thickness (P = .08), corneal curvature (P = .47), anterior chamber depth (P = .80), age (P = .60), or sex (P = .73). There was a positive correlation between OPA and intraocular pressure (0.12 mm Hg/1 mm Hg of intraocular pressure; P Conclusions The OPA readings obtained with dynamic contour tonometry in healthy subjects are not influenced by the structure of the anterior segment of the eye but are affected by intraocular pressure and axial length. We found a high amount of agreement within and between observers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In vivo, blood flow through the choroid leads to a fluctuation of IOP known as the ocular pulse with an amplitude of about 2 mmHg.
“In vivo, the blood flow through the choroid leads to a fluctuation of the IOP known as the ocular pulse that has an amplitude of about 2 mmHg [22, 23].”
From Structural control of corneal transparency, refractive power and dynamics (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Hemodynamic Patterns of Age-Related Changes in Blood Pressure: The Framingham Heart Study
Franklin, S. S., Gustin, W., Wong, N. D., Larson, M. G., Weber, M. A., Kannel, W. B., & Levy, D. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.1.308 · Cited by 2,321 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Structural control of corneal transparency, refractive power and dynamics
Meek, K. M., Knupp, C., Lewis, P. N., Morgan, S. R., & Hayes, S. (2025) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-024-02969-7 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaufmann, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Kaufmann, Claude
- ORCID
- Kaufmann, Claude
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1104
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004099106
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Keywords
- ocular pulse amplitude, dynamic contour tonometry, central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, axial length, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, observer agreement, intraobserver variability, interobserver variability, healthy eyes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anterior Chamber, Anthropometry, Cornea, Eye, Female, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Tonometry, Ocular, Observer Variation, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review