Cited by 154Glaucoma and retinal disordersCorneal surgery and disordersIntraocular Surgery and Lenses

Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Healthy Subjects as Measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry

Kaufmann, Claude·2006·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objectives To test whether dynamic contour tonometry yields ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements that are independent of corneal thickness and curvature, and to assess variables of observer agreement. Methods In a multivariate cluster analysis on 223 eyes, the relationship between central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, axial length, anterior chamber depth, intraocular pressure, sex, age, and OPA measurements was assessed. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were calculated from repeated measurements obtained from 8 volunteers by 4 observers. Results The OPA readings were not affected by central corneal thickness (P = .08), corneal curvature (P = .47), anterior chamber depth (P = .80), age (P = .60), or sex (P = .73). There was a positive correlation between OPA and intraocular pressure (0.12 mm Hg/1 mm Hg of intraocular pressure; P Conclusions The OPA readings obtained with dynamic contour tonometry in healthy subjects are not influenced by the structure of the anterior segment of the eye but are affected by intraocular pressure and axial length. We found a high amount of agreement within and between observers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.124.8.1104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo, blood flow through the choroid leads to a fluctuation of IOP known as the ocular pulse with an amplitude of about 2 mmHg.

    “In vivo, the blood flow through the choroid leads to a fluctuation of the IOP known as the ocular pulse that has an amplitude of about 2 mmHg [22, 23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaufmann, C.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Kaufmann, Claude
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
124
Issue
8
Pages
1104
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004099106
Cited by
154
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Keywords
ocular pulse amplitude, dynamic contour tonometry, central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, axial length, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, observer agreement, intraobserver variability, interobserver variability, healthy eyes
MeSH terms
Adult, Anterior Chamber, Anthropometry, Cornea, Eye, Female, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Tonometry, Ocular, Observer Variation, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review