Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical Evaluation of Nerve Fiber Layer Atrophy as an Indicator of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Damage

Quigley, H. A., Miller, N. R., George, T.·1980·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (NFL) appearance in the estimation of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, we examined 335 eyes of normal, glaucoma suspect, of glaucomatous patients. In eyes with field loss, 84% had NFL atrophy. In normal eyes, NFL atrophy was suspected in 3%. In glaucoma suspects, 13% of eyes had NFL defects. Defects in glaucoma suspect eyes were more often localized, compared with the diffuse atrophy found in eyes with visual field loss. The NFL abnormalities were seen in areas of the retina corresponding to the location of visual field defects with a high accuracy. The NFL examination is as sensitive in detecting eyes with field loss as the optic disc configuration and may help to identify which eyes are suffering optic nerve damage prior to field loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040416003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Quigley, H. A., Miller, N. R., & George, T.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1980-09-01
Volume
98
Issue
9
Pages
1564-1571
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021775220
Cited by
340
References
0
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.