The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphometric Analysis of Macular Photoreceptors and Ganglion Cells in Retinas With Retinitis Pigmentosa
Abstract
There have been a number of histopathologic studies of retinas that were taken post mortem from patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), but few have addressed the question of transneuronal degeneration of ganglion cells secondary to photoreceptor death. We studied sectioned maculae that were obtained from 41 patients with different genetic forms of RP: autosomal dominant (n = 11); X-linked (n = 9); and simplex (n = 21). We also studied sectioned maculae that were taken from 20 age-matched normal subjects. We counted cell bodies in the photoreceptor and ganglion cell layers at 100-microns (0.35 degrees) intervals from the foveola to 1500-microns eccentricity and compared the mean cell counts among each group with RP. Each RP type had significantly fewer (P < .05) photoreceptors than those of the control group at each 100-microns interval. At eccentricities of 700 to 1500 microns, the retinas with X-linked and autosomal dominant RP had significantly fewer (P < .05) ganglion cells than those of the control group; the simplex RP mean ganglion cell counts were significantly lower (P < .05) than those of the control group, from 1000 to 1500 microns. The mean photoreceptor and ganglion cell counts had a .43 correlation (P < .001) in the zone of 700 to 1500 microns, consistent with transneuronal ganglion cell degeneration. Current experimental attempts to restore vision in diseased retinas by simulating or replacing photoreceptors are based on the premise that ganglion cells are retained after photoreceptor death. Our findings support this assumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A point mutation of the rhodopsin gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa
Dryja, T. P., McGee, T. L., Reichel, E., Hahn, L. B., Cowley, G. S., Yandell, D. W., Sandberg, M. A., & Berson, E. L. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/343364a0 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa
Verbakel, S. K., van Huet, R. A. C., Boon, C. J. F., den Hollander, A. I., Collin, R. W. J., Klaver, C. C. W., Hoyng, C. B., Roepman, R., & Klevering, B. J. (2018) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.03.005 · Cited by 973
Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration
Marc, R. E., Jones, B. W., Watt, C. B., & Strettoi, E. (2003) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(03)00039-9 · Cited by 867
Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina
Humayun, M. S., de Juan Jr., E., Weiland, J. D., Dagnelie, G., Katona, S., Greenberg, R., & Suzuki, S. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00052-8 · Cited by 592
Retinal remodeling triggered by photoreceptor degenerations
Jones, B. W., Watt, C. B., Frederick, J. M., Baehr, W., Chen, C., Levine, E. M., Milam, A. H., Lavail, M. M., & Marc, R. E. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10703 · Cited by 476
Retinal remodeling during retinal degeneration
Jones, B. W., & Marc, R. E. (2005) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2005.03.006 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, J. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1634
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988750763
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphometric Analysis of Macular Photoreceptors and Ganglion Cells in Retinas With Retinitis Pigmentosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080230134038
- The paper
- Stone, J. L. (1992). Morphometric Analysis of Macular Photoreceptors and Ganglion Cells in Retinas With Retinitis Pigmentosa. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080230134038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.