The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Improvement in Visual Acuity and Subjective Visual Function After Surgery in the First, Second, and Both Eyes
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: No previous study documents improvement in visual acuity and subjective visual function associated with cataract surgery in the first eye, second eye, and both eyes. Measurement of subjective aspects of visual function and quality of life provides information that cannot be obtained with simple measurement of Snellen visual acuity. METHODS: From 76 ophthalmology practices in three cities, patients undergoing cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (n = 613) and comparison patients (n = 408) were enrolled in a prospective study. Questionnaires elicited visual function information before and after surgery, and visual acuity was obtained from the ophthalmologic record. RESULTS: Among patients with cataract and no other eye disease, baseline subjective visual function before surgery in the second eye was better than that before surgery in the first eye. Improvement in subjective visual function was approximately equal postoperatively in first and second eyes. Improvement in subjective function in both eyes postoperatively was significantly greater than that after surgery in the first eye or second eye alone. No statistically significant difference across surgical groups in the proportion of patients demonstrating improvement in visual acuity was observed. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent surgery in both eyes reported greater improvement in subjective visual function than did those who underwent surgery in one eye. Thus, there seems to be a benefit associated with restoring binocular vision in this population. These findings support the policy recommendation that cataract surgery in both eyes remains the appropriate treatment for patients with bilateral, cataract-induced visual impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of the 25-list-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire
Mangione, C. M. (2001) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050 · Cited by 2,230
Psychometric Properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ)
Mangione, C. M. (1998) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.116.11.1496 · Cited by 848
Influence of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss on Health-Related Quality of Life
Gutierrez, P. (1997) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150779014 · Cited by 400
Harwood, R. H. (2005) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.049478 · Cited by 395
National Study of Cataract Surgery Outcomes
Steinberg, E. P., Tielsch, J. M., Schein, O. D., Javitt, J. C., Sharkey, P., Cassard, S. D., Legro, M. W., Diener-West, M., Bass, E. B., Damiano, A. M., et al. (1994) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31210-3 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Javitt, J. C.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-05-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 686
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056248433
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Improvement in Visual Acuity and Subjective Visual Function After Surgery in the First, Second, and Both Eyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050120041
- The paper
- Javitt, J. C. (1993). Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Improvement in Visual Acuity and Subjective Visual Function After Surgery in the First, Second, and Both Eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050120041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.