The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Laser Photocoagulation of Subfoveal Neovascular Lesions of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Updated Findings From Two Clinical Trials
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report 3- and 4-year visual outcomes in eyes followed up in two randomized clinical trials of laser photocoagulation for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eyes of consenting patients were assigned randomly to laser treatment or no treatment. Visual acuity, reading speed, and contrast threshold were measured before random assignment, 3 and 6 months later, and at 6-month intervals thereafter. Visual acuities of treated and untreated eyes were compared 4 years after enrollment, in the Subfoveal New CNV Study (eyes without prior laser treatment), and 3 years after enrollment, in the Subfoveal Recurrent CNV Study (eyes with subfoveal recurrent CNV at the periphery of an earlier laser treatment scar). RESULTS: Four years after enrollment in the Subfoveal New CNV Study, 39 (47%) of 83 untreated eyes and 17 (22%) of 77 laser-treated eyes had lost 6 or more lines of visual acuity from baseline levels (P = .002). At the 3-year examination in the Subfoveal Recurrent CNV Study, 21 (36%) of 58 untreated eyes and six (12%) of 49 treated eyes had lost 6 or more lines of visual acuity from baseline levels (P = .009). Comparisons based on contrast threshold and reading speed for enlarged text also favored laser treatment in both trials. CONCLUSIONS: Stronger evidence favoring laser photocoagulation of subfoveal CNV has been provided by continued follow-up of patients enrolled in these two clinical trials. The benefits of laser treatment have persisted through at least 4 years of follow-up in the Subfoveal New CNV Study and 3 years of follow-up in the Subfoveal Recurrent CNV Study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Visual acuity decreased to 20/200 or worse at 2 years in 45% to 75% of patients with no treatment and in 30% to 40% with photodynamic therapy”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Two years after diagnosis, fewer than 10% of patients retained vision of 20/40 or better with no treatment and fewer than 15% of patients treated with photodynamic therapy retained 20/40 or better.31–33”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–304 of 304
Approach to Diagnostic Testing
Tao, Y. K., & Hwang, D. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2486-7_6
Japiassú, R. M., Cialdini, A. P., Hilgert, C. R., & Bach, B. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29358-0_90-1
Dome‐shaped macula in high myopia: Prevalence and clinical characteristics in a French cohort
Fabbro, S. D., Philippakis, E., Carlà, M. M., Panda‐Jonas, S., Jonas, J. B., Gaudric, A., & Couturier, A. (2026) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.70191
Japiassú, R. M., Cialdini, A. P., Hilgert, C. R., & Bach, B. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23052-2_90
Metadata
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1200
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4251720370
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u01ey002546-07, 5u01ey002547-07)
- National Eye Institute (EY02547, EY02546, EY02548)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- laser photocoagulation, subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, age-related macular degeneration, visual acuity outcomes, long-term follow-up, recurrent CNVs, contrast threshold, reading speed
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Choroid, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Follow-Up Studies, Fovea Centralis, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Reading, Recurrence, Sensory Thresholds, Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, Laser Coagulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review