Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Race-, Age-, Gender-, and Refractive Error—Related Differences in the Normal Optic Disc

Varma, Rohit·1994·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the size and topography of the optic disc in healthy Americans. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: Eastern and southeastern health districts of Baltimore, Md. PARTICIPANTS: A population-based sample of 4877 non-institutionalized black and white individuals aged 40 years or older without evidence of optic nerve disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in optic disc measurements: disc area, neural rim area, cup area, cup-to-disc ratio, and neural rim area-to-disc area ratio. RESULTS: We analyzed simultaneous stereoscopic optic disc photographs from 3387 (1534 black and 1853 white) of the 4877 healthy individuals using an image analyzer (Topcon Image Analyzer, Topcon Instrument Corporation, Paramus, NJ). A total of 1490 individuals were excluded owing to the absence of good-quality images from either eye. The image analyzer defined the cup margin 150 microns below the surface of the disc margin. On average, blacks had significantly larger disc areas (blacks, 2.94 mm2; whites, 2.63 mm2), larger cup areas (blacks, 1.04 mm2; whites, 0.71 mm2), larger cup-to-disc ratios (blacks, 0.56; whites, 0.49), similar neural rim areas (blacks, 1.90 mm2; whites, 1.92 mm2), and smaller neural rim area-to-disc area ratios (blacks, 0.66; whites, 0.74) compared with whites. There were no age-related differences in any of the disc measurements. Male subjects had 2% to 3% larger optic discs compared with female subjects. No association between refractive error and any of the optic disc measurements studied was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in the normal optic disc are present among urban Americans, and these differences must be considered in evaluation of the optic disc for glaucoma and other optic neuropathies. Among the individuals in our study, all of whom were 40 years of age or older, no progressive age-related decline in neural rim area was detectable. Neither gender nor refractive error were associated with any significant differences in the size and topography of the normal optic disc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090200074026

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Varma, R.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1994-08-01
Volume
112
Issue
8
Pages
1068
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139762445
Cited by
373
References
21
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race-, Age-, Gender-, and Refractive Error—Related Differences in the Normal Optic Disc. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090200074026
The paper
Varma, R. (1994). Race-, Age-, Gender-, and Refractive Error—Related Differences in the Normal Optic Disc. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090200074026

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.