The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XIV. Ten-Year Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the 10-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. DESIGN: Population-based incidence study. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred sixty-five insulin-taking diabetic persons diagnosed before age 30 years, 251 insulin-taking diabetic persons diagnosed at age 30 years or older, and 282 non-insulin-taking diabetic persons diagnosed at age 30 years or older who participated in baseline, 4-year, and 10-year follow-up examinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 10-year incidence of any retinopathy, progression of retinopathy, and progression to proliferative retinopathy were detected by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs using the modified Airlie House classification and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity scheme. RESULTS: The 10-year incidence of retinopathy (89%, 79%, and 67%), progression of retinopathy (76%, 69%, and 53%), and progression to proliferative retinopathy (30%, 24%, and 10%) were highest in the group diagnosed before age 30 years, intermediate in the insulin-taking group diagnosed at age 30 years or older, and lowest in the non-insulin-taking group, respectively. Increased risk of proliferative retinopathy was associated with more severe retinopathy at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest relatively high 10-year rates of incidence and progression of retinopathy, and despite changes in the treatment of diabetes, there has been little change in the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy during the 10-year study period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pirart, J. (1978) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.1.3.168 · Cited by 1,290
Cited by
Fong, D. S., Aiello, L., Gardner, T. W., King, G. L., Blankenship, G., Cavallerano, J. D., Ferris, F. L., Klein, R., & for the American Diabetes Association (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s84 · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationDiabetic Retinopathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association
Solomon, S. D., Chew, E., Duh, E. J., Sobrin, L., Sun, J. K., VanderBeek, B. L., Wykoff, C. C., & Gardner, T. W. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2641 · Cited by 940
Important Causes of Visual Impairment in the World Today
Congdon, N. G. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.15.2057 · Cited by 698
Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: A systematic review
Williams, R., Airey, M., Baxter, H., Forrester, J., Kennedy-Martin, T., & Girach, A. (2004) · Eye · doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701476 · Cited by 472
Visual impairment and blindness in Europe and their prevention
Kocur, I., & Resnikoff, S. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.7.716 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, R.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1217
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065034219
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XIV. Ten-Year Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090210105023
- The paper
- Klein, R. (1994). The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XIV. Ten-Year Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090210105023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.